Well, whatever you need to justify using it. but one key difference here, Trump is not in here and I am sure had he been, Horgen would have banned him for saying shit like that.

So let´s be clear advocating violence just because you don´t like someone´s political stand is never ok and neither is advocating violence because someone else did it. Remember you can´t critic something you are willing or have done yourself.

But anyways Kavanaugh is confirmed and the only solution now if the Democrats really want to, is an impeachment proceeding, which they need to get more than a few Republican senators onboard with before they can even begin to talk about a conviction as well. Which Ford is not onboard with for some "strange" reason.

Well, it may be something he said but you pick to use it against Kavanaugh

Well, it´s not really anyone else's comment, you picked that and used it against a sitting supreme court justice.

Also, remember what Gandhi said, an eye for an eye makes the entire world blind on one eye.

Threats of violence are never ok, but I get your sarcasm, even though it's misplaced.

I am sure he does. but who knows it´s trump after all.

Still, I think your comment crossed the line there.

Well, Serra is usually reasonable but the quote was clearly meant as I suspect most think Trump meant it, that someone actually takes care of Kavanaugh the only way that will remove him.

But I have no idea how you guys deal with this. Just thought it was a line crossed. You can disagree politically but violence is never ok.

Well, this is not Donald Trump's forum and I think most agree that violence is not the answer.

So are you really suggesting that someone should go "take care" of Kavanaugh?

Hmm, I would watch those threats, Serra.

Maybe Horgen can give gamespots 5 cents on what is clearly a lethal threat against a sitting US supreme court justice.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45565684

Problem is though that these things are incredibly hard to prove and in most cases, there is not any conviction or final answer.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system

So while you can believe women basis on the mere fact that it´s a woman saying it, facts prove that it´s extremely rare that there is enough evidence to prove either complete innocent or complete guilt

Considering the passing of Mccain, I won´t engage you on that side, out of respect which you seem to not be able to do.