@nomadsalt That's Chinese.
Source: I'm Chinese.

@dr_jashugan Well, there's a reason why E3 is a bigger event than Gamescom.

Considering that Sony pressured and managed to change Microsoft's game restrictions because of the pressure, it should be easy to see why the PS4 is more favoured.

It's not that common to see Microsoft follow another company's lead and change things late in production.

@arqe @ItsTakuya I'd gladly play PS2 games on a PS3 though. PS2 had Monster Hunter, which was nonexistent on the PS3.

And there might be worthy PS3 IPs that won't board the PS4 bandwagon. Instead of spending my time bitching about the developers, I'd rather be playing the actual game itself for entertainment.

As a budding game designer, I hope that I can one day create a VR MMORPG (very much like Sword Art Online) someday hahaha.
... that is if my music career path doesn't work out

"only 5 percent of gamers play past-generation titles on new machines."
That's because the machines don't allow the general consumer to do so; only those hardcore enough to modify their machines get to play them. This statistic is bullshit.

@CharlesBurns Because smartphones play games horribly without physical buttons for precision control (unless you are talking about simple tapping games like Jetpack Joyride), and that there isn't any developers creating triple-A titles for smartphones (at least none that I know of).

@CharlesBurns Bad idea. I have no need for another TV when I already have one, so why should I buy everything that I already have when all I need is the console?

While it may be interesting as a standalone product, I won't expect to see that product generate much profit.