@restatbonfire: And it's getting shut down already, so I assume that lots of folks who don't care about this stuff never heard of it either. But good job being a well informed hipster. Wouldn't wanna embarrass yourself by not being up to date on all the latest news about social media and other crap other folks tend to avoid.
Comments like this are unnecessary. I find it ironic you still got yourself informed anyway didn't you?
@mogan: It's called consistency. If the reviewer was not expecting some kind of backlash for such a low score he must be disillusioned.
The most interesting aspect of this review is that it doesn't read like a 4/10 game. The pros and cons are mostly the same, yet the game drops to half the score a few years later?
I'll be the first to say I would probably not enjoy Wonderful 101 enough even back in the day, but would I still make a good reviewer for it then?
Can anyone honestly explain to me why almost every single time a port, from god knows how many years ago, is announced always releases on Xbox, Playstation and PC but NOT ON SWITCH?
@midgar: A port is usually made from a final product and not the other way around. What I got from what the reps said is that they won't make unnecessary compromises when porting games to the Switch. It's been pretty common for many games not being ported exactly for that reason, with a few exceptions...
@nintendians: Smash 4 and specially Ultimate are a significant step above Brawl in what concerns pure gameplay. Ultimate just happens to be the best of the bunch, but could not end up this way if Brawl didn't exist in the first place.
@evilish: You sound so logical yet not so quite: you play games therefore you waste your time, and after the big bang there's nothing new because everything has been recycled... :)
Chico86_basic's comments