Looks positively delicious! I suggest everyone gets mega hyped for this game because it will be astoundingly good. There is absolutely no way it could possibly flop so if you haven't already ordered a PS4 then I suggest you do so simply because of this fantastic cheeky looking number.
Looks positively delicious! I suggest everyone gets mega hyped for this game because it will be astoundingly good. There is absolutely no way it could possibly flop so if you haven't already ordered a PS4 then I suggest you do so simply because of this fantastic cheeky looking number.
I see what you did there.
I must say, console gamers are starting to give this impression that "Graphics > ALL". Sure, we get a lot of great looking PC games, but few PC gamers jumped onto Crysis 3 just from seeing its pretty graphics. I'm losing a lot of respect in the two consoles, having seen the priorities of their marketing.
IQ looks garbage and there's a lot of depth of field blur (which also seems low quality judging by the first pic, which also has crap bokeh effects too). Generally just looks a bit washy. AO seems a bit poor too as do the real time shadows.
That's an absolute yes! The amount of particle effects, superb volumetric lighting and dense geometry cramped into this game all at 1080p is just ridiculous, no other launch game on either systems can remotely begin to match that. And this is only GG's launch title, their new ip should be mind blowing.
For a playstation launch title it's still impressive (the most impressive one, easily), but it's still rooted in last generation. It'll be a while before we see games that start to take full advantage of the Ps4.
This is going to look Resistance fall of man-ish soon.
@GhoX: That was 4k? Although it isn't uncommon to see screens in such resolution I remember some of the infamous second sons one being in 5k resolution
I think the characters from the trailer we seen are more impressive than the overall graphics like environment but they art direction is pretty nice
Yeah that doesn't exist. Queen maybe, but even that's stretching it, lets go with Console graphics jester.
Considering that consoles have won many award for graphics even when PC is there i say it does exist.
Graphics awards is one thing, claiming something to be graphics king (king being the highest "quality") when there are games that beat it is not correct.
You seriously think MGS4 should be graphics king over Crysis Warhead? (since the GS award was mentioned)
Yeah that doesn't exist. Queen maybe, but even that's stretching it, lets go with Console graphics jester.
Considering that consoles have won many award for graphics even when PC is there i say it does exist.
Graphics awards is one thing, claiming something to be graphics king (king being the highest "quality") when there's plenty that beats it is not correct.
System Wars remember, not Console Wars.
if you look at most of those graphics awards, they don't even include PC games.
That does look really good. I just can't drum up any interest in the series though. Reviews will truly tell the story. Sony can't afford for this game to flop[ with its launch line-up. Its previewing nicely so far.
I have only ONE concern with Killzone: Shadow Fall
The Multiplayer is static. There's no leveling/unlock system. It encourages more skill over time invested; however, you're basically playing for stats and achievement points. You're not working TOWARD things like you do in BF/CoD/Destiny/etc.... Might get boring after a while.
Halo 3 had this same effect on me: Great story, great visuals... really boring multiplayer. All you played for was a ranking. Personally, I need more than that. But that's just me.
I have only ONE concern with Killzone: Shadow Fall
The Multiplayer is static. There's no leveling/unlock system. It encourages more skill over time invested; however, you're basically playing for stats and achievement points. You're not working TOWARD things like you do in BF/CoD/Destiny/etc.... Might get boring after a while.
Halo 3 had this same effect on me: Great story, great visuals... really boring multiplayer. All you played for was a ranking. Personally, I need more than that. But that's just me.
I've always hated leveling systems which reward players with perks.
It literally equilibrates to a situation where more time spent on a game leads to superior in-game abilities which is terrible competitive game design. It can be fun getting abilities though.
I have only ONE concern with Killzone: Shadow Fall
The Multiplayer is static. There's no leveling/unlock system. It encourages more skill over time invested; however, you're basically playing for stats and achievement points. You're not working TOWARD things like you do in BF/CoD/Destiny/etc.... Might get boring after a while.
Halo 3 had this same effect on me: Great story, great visuals... really boring multiplayer. All you played for was a ranking. Personally, I need more than that. But that's just me.
I actually welcome this. Multiplayer shouldn't be about your global stats or rewarding you for play time, it should be about winning the match at hand. An arbitrary rank does not determine skill. How you play in the match does. Your past performance shouldn't matter to what you're doing in the here-and-now.
I hope it breeds a more competitive environment rather than one where people want to grind for EXP to show off how little of a life they have.
I am not hyped for this game.. but I gotta say those really do look good..
Man looking at this part.. I hope it was Guerilla making SW battlefront and not Dice. Imagine corusant looking like that..
I got some massive starwars feels from that scene as well.
This game looks so flippin good. It's getting easy to see who's bullshitting with the comments at this point.
The GT gameplay analysis was really awesome, this is more tactical than previous KZ's and the level design is much more open ended and wide with multiple paths. It's no longer Straight Line war battle ala Call of duty or previous KZ's.
It reminds me of Halo 4. Bullshots and gifs/screens from alpha builds where the game looks good only because it's empty space with nothing in it but a few buildings and rocks. Sho me gameplay with stuff going on looking that good and then I will believe it. It's the same BS pulled by Halo 4.
It reminds me of Halo 4. Bullshots and gifs/screens from alpha builds where the game looks good only because it's empty space with nothing in it but a few buildings and rocks. Sho me gameplay with stuff going on looking that good and then I will believe it. It's the same BS pulled by Halo 4.
343 is a special kind of awful, I've seen plenty of great looking gameplay so far.
It reminds me of Halo 4. Bullshots and gifs/screens from alpha builds where the game looks good only because it's empty space with nothing in it but a few buildings and rocks. Sho me gameplay with stuff going on looking that good and then I will believe it. It's the same BS pulled by Halo 4.
There's tons of gameplay footage in my OP. Feel free to watch them and judge the graphics. Nothing else on consoles comes close. This isn't some bait and switch like 343 did with Halo 4.
I have only ONE concern with Killzone: Shadow Fall
The Multiplayer is static. There's no leveling/unlock system. It encourages more skill over time invested; however, you're basically playing for stats and achievement points. You're not working TOWARD things like you do in BF/CoD/Destiny/etc.... Might get boring after a while.
Halo 3 had this same effect on me: Great story, great visuals... really boring multiplayer. All you played for was a ranking. Personally, I need more than that. But that's just me.
I've always hated leveling systems which reward players with perks.
It literally equilibrates to a situation where more time spent on a game leads to superior in-game abilities which is terrible competitive game design. It can be fun getting abilities though.
I play for score.
Preach. I like to kill n00bs with skill not perks
KZ:SF actually requires skill so this is a great thing. Even a new gamer can hop into CoD and get kills
It reminds me of Halo 4. Bullshots and gifs/screens from alpha builds where the game looks good only because it's empty space with nothing in it but a few buildings and rocks. Sho me gameplay with stuff going on looking that good and then I will believe it. It's the same BS pulled by Halo 4.
Log in to comment