Halo 3 requires no skill, CoD4 has more skill.

[QUOTE="Rza_rectah"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"]Yes, a game where newbies start with nothing and veterans of the game start off with everything. Yes, wonderful design choice. Earning those simply put less skill.ArisShadows

[QUOTE="Rza_rectah"][QUOTE="EazyD91"]try owning guys in MLG at halo, they'll own you right out the doorEazyD91

[QUOTE="smokingsbad"]

[QUOTE="enterawesome"]Honestly, I can't believe how good those guys are. The can perfectly line up a sniper shot in less than half a second while following a running target in comat....mitu123

i have both and disagree.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="smokingsbad"]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnF0aH3fDZg

smokingsbad

I swear, if MW2 doesn't tone down the number of grenades in the multiplayer I will not be buying the game. COD4 is just ridiculous with the amount of grenades you have to deal with.

And realistic? Yeah, a game that tells you when you're hitting someone with noises (including through walls and whatnot) sure adds to the realism factor.

Even the devs dont have faith in this game. "Fireifght is not more fun then horde mode its just different Hot garbage".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWiRBRYCQJI

Haven't palyed Halo 3 so I can't comment, but COD4 skill? Yes it requires skill just like any game but has a very small learning curve, noob friendly unbalance weapons and perks, grenade spamming etc.. Both games are more of arcade shooters and don't require much skill. Play Red Orchestra, CS or DoD - those games require a lot of skill.

they both take no skill, but Halo takes more skill if I had to choosesmokingsbad

CoD4 has such fast reflexes, more realistic, better weapon variety, better maps.

In CoD 4 you cant run anywhere or find some overshields or bubble to hide. In halo3 you can escape from an enemy and you die from nowhere.

CoD4 you have to aim, you work in teams, you create a plan to eliminate the other opponents unlike your nine year old friends on halo who QQ when they die cause theyre too young for this game.

CoD4 also is just better. Has a better dev. Snipers in cod4 are so much more pro than halo also. The BR is the most easy weapon to use.

Discuss.

xxcodmanxx

CoD requires skill? Really?

They both take skill.

Halo 3 requires waay more skill than CoD4, neither is that high in terms of skill that you need to use, but sometime you need a lot in Halo 3 while Cod4 you hardly need any at all.

CoD4 takes no skill at all. I can use 3x Frag and have a positive kd in a match. There are so many ways to get cheap kills on that game that its hard to say it requires an ounce of skill

No, CoD4 doesn't require any skill to win, it requires double tap, deep penetration, and an MP5. Most inblanced game ever created, IMO.enterawesome

Meh.... Counter Strike > both

I agree with TC though about COD4 > Halo 3

I desagree. On Halo theres not similar weapons. Every single weapon (and vehicle) has its strong and weak points and you actually need to master them to deliver. Its perfectly balanced imo

[QUOTE="enterawesome"]No, CoD4 doesn't require any skill to win, it requires double tap, deep penetration, and an MP5. Most inblanced game ever created, IMO.Saturos3091

I wouldnt say NO skill. But CoD 4 definently takes more skill and training.

CoD4 has such fast reflexes, more realistic, better weapon variety, better maps.

In CoD 4 you cant run anywhere or find some overshields or bubble to hide. In halo3 you can escape from an enemy and you die from nowhere.

CoD4 you have to aim, you work in teams, you create a plan to eliminate the other opponents unlike your nine year old friends on halo who QQ when they die cause theyre too young for this game.

CoD4 also is just better. Has a better dev. Snipers in cod4 are so much more pro than halo also. The BR is the most easy weapon to use.

Discuss.

xxcodmanxx

Being a PC gamer who is use to skill based games like Counter-Strike Source... I will say this. Halo definitely requires a lot more skill than CoD4. CoD4 is the definition of a noob game... if the dictionary had an entry for "Noob Game", Call of Duty 4 would be in the desciption. Imbalanced weapons, heavy emphasis on grenade throwing, extreme amount of running/gunning (no tactical or strategic play), auto-aim, being able to throw a grenade to the other side of the map and net 3 kills, imbalanced perks (some completely useless), map design that encourages camping as opposed to skillful fights, random gunfights (it's all about who catches who, first), lack of team-based gameplay (since when did CoD idiots play as a team using Mic?), oh and last, but not least, the absolutely stupid Helicopter/Dogs, bulls***. Free kills? Can't get any more noobish than that. Sure, it can be a fun game, and it's great for causual pick up and play shooter experience, but is it designed for skilled players? Hell no. Halo requires legions more skill.

Modern Warfare 2 is going be even worse than CoD4. Seriously... Dual Deagles? WTFFFFFFF!???? Knife throwing? Since when did US marines resort to knife throwing...? You are a complete and total idiot if you consider the Call of Duty series to require skill.

That being said, neither Halo or CoD4 require as much as skill as Counterstrike to be good. There is no such thing as free kills in Counterstrike.

I noticed trough playing CoD2 with my friends. Actualy scratch that. I was playing... they were doing something else...

They lern a simple rutine for a map (mostly Toujane S&D for CoD).
For Toujane its:
Throw nade at enemy spawn...
Switch to main weapon...
Run for a couple of seconds...
Take aim...
Watch for enemies...
Shoot enemies...
Kill enemies...
Move towards bomb...
Place bomb...
Wait for the enemy guys to come to you
Shoot enemies...
Kill enemies...
Win...
Repeat 200x...

CoD sounds fun!

CoD4 has such fast reflexes, more realistic, better weapon variety, better maps.

In CoD 4 you cant run anywhere or find some overshields or bubble to hide. In halo3 you can escape from an enemy and you die from nowhere.

CoD4 you have to aim, you work in teams, you create a plan to eliminate the other opponents unlike your nine year old friends on halo who QQ when they die cause theyre too young for this game.

CoD4 also is just better. Has a better dev. Snipers in cod4 are so much more pro than halo also. The BR is the most easy weapon to use.

Discuss.

xxcodmanxx

LOL

for me. i find halo 3 alot hard than cod 4.

my k/d for cod4 is 1.6 while halo is 0.9

so yeah mainly because halo takes longer to kill someone and they have a chance to surive and run away or kill you first.

im totally hopeless with jump shoot fps. like halo 3 and ut3.

Halo is quite difficult for non deathmatch games.... my Ranked k/d in halo is 1.3, not bad for leaving my xbox all the time in the middle of games :P

Go play against the high level Halo players and get back to me. I gonna need details on how they made you cry.

2.25 k/d with 100k kills on cod4, 3.14 k/d with 55k kills on cod5... 1.75 k/d in Social with 30k in Halo 3..Cod is way easier. Ranked Halo is brutal. DeadMagazines

You mean COD4 is much easier..got it thanks. DeadMagazines

lmfao nice one mate

Neither of them require any skill. The person with better aiming wins, always.Maqda7

[QUOTE="Maqda7"]Neither of them require any skill. The person with better aiming wins, always.-DrRobotnik-

Rainbow 6 Vegas takes more skill then either of em so /shrug

FPS suck in consoles, so arguing about it its silly and retarded since at the end of the day, both are equally boring. Have fun with your autoaim :D

neonvzla

[QUOTE="neonvzla"]

FPS suck in consoles, so arguing about it its silly and retarded since at the end of the day, both are equally boring. Have fun with your autoaim :D

SpideR_CentS

Fighting and Sports actually suck on PC unless you have a gamepad, but thats the joy of PC, you can actually use gamepads with it and off you go.

But can you turn off your autoaim on your console FPS and have a go against someone using a kb/m?.

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]

[QUOTE="neonvzla"]

FPS suck in consoles, so arguing about it its silly and retarded since at the end of the day, both are equally boring. Have fun with your autoaim :D

neonvzla

Fighting and Sports actually suck on PC unless you have a gamepad, but thats the joy of PC, you can actually use gamepads with it and off you go.

But can you turn off your autoaim on your console FPS and have a go against someone using a kb/m?.

kb/m is for people with no skills

SpideR_CentS

Oh, Lol.

Now I remember why I decided to stay away of SW long ago. Things never change.

[QUOTE="xxcodmanxx"]

CoD4 has such fast reflexes, more realistic, better weapon variety, better maps.

In CoD 4 you cant run anywhere or find some overshields or bubble to hide. In halo3 you can escape from an enemy and you die from nowhere.

CoD4 you have to aim, you work in teams, you create a plan to eliminate the other opponents unlike your nine year old friends on halo who QQ when they die cause theyre too young for this game.

CoD4 also is just better. Has a better dev. Snipers in cod4 are so much more pro than halo also. The BR is the most easy weapon to use.

Discuss.

psn8214

I've yet to see this on CoD4 now that you mention it...

Lol...exactly..which is why i don't understand all the fuss over headsets for PS3. It's only used for fighting, swearing and racism. The day i see people using it for actual teamwork, i'll accept it.