Does Ryse look better than Tomb Raider maxed on PC??

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by gamespot4life (1215 posts) -

I'm just curious to what people think and I only really want answers from people who own both games so I can get an honest non biased opinion. Thanks

#2 Posted by naz99 (1217 posts) -

In what way???

Art direction?

Polygon count?

Resolution?

Framerate?

And why bother with such a pointless comparison?...2 different games for 2 different platforms

#3 Posted by gamespot4life (1215 posts) -

why bother posting that pointless reply?

#4 Edited by Chutebox (36630 posts) -

@gamespot4life: His post wasn't pointless. He asked for clarification

#5 Edited by lostrib (34508 posts) -

Does ryse have magical hair physics?

#6 Posted by gamespot4life (1215 posts) -

@naz99:

all of the above of course.

#7 Posted by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -

No idea.

#8 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@naz99:

all of the above of course.

let's see

Art direction: that's subjective

Polygon count: look it up, but I would guess ryse

Frame rate: Tomb Raider

Resolution: Tomb Raider

#9 Posted by speedfreak48t5p (6946 posts) -

Tomb Raider PC is better visually.

Tomb Raider is also a good game, unlike Ryse.

#10 Posted by gamespot4life (1215 posts) -

I'm playing it at max right now and I don't see why its not mentioned more often than it is when it comes to best graphics. this game looks amazing

#11 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

I'm playing it at max right now and I don't see why its not mentioned more often than it is when it comes to best graphics. this game looks amazing

cool story bro

#12 Posted by Nengo_Flow (9511 posts) -

Why are we still talking about a 4/10 game?

#13 Edited by millerlight89 (18347 posts) -

Kind of a stupid comparison, but I will bite. TR on PC looks better, especially when you take into account the scal of the environments. Ryse has such tiny ass environments it is unreal. It's obvious it was a Kinect game. Plus, Ryse has like super clean environments. TR wins art direction as well. I also find Ryse to be a little fuzzy.

#14 Posted by napo_sp (221 posts) -

good luck buying a pc that can max tomb raider with 4x SSAA at 1080p or greater first, by this fact alone TR on PC >>> ryse+killzone+infamous+theorder.

#15 Posted by millerlight89 (18347 posts) -

@napo_sp said:

good luck buying a pc that can max tomb raider with 4x SSAA at 1080p or greater first

Why does someone need luck to buy a PC

#16 Posted by gamespot4life (1215 posts) -

@napo_sp said:

good luck buying a pc that can max tomb raider with 4x SSAA at 1080p or greater first, by this fact alone TR on PC >>> ryse+killzone+infamous+theorder.

I can max it on my gtx 660ti.... not counting the hair effects that takes away some fps

#17 Posted by Couth_ (10015 posts) -

@napo_sp said:

good luck buying a pc that can max tomb raider with 4x SSAA at 1080p or greater first

Why does someone need luck to buy a PC

lold

#18 Posted by GravityX (695 posts) -

So much lies in this tiny post. Ryse looks miles better of course.

And yes it scored a 4 but after playing it myself, that was a inaccurate and suffered from E3 taint.

#19 Posted by LanceSSJ (880 posts) -

whether its too linear or short. Ryse is the BEST LOOKING game on either console right now. Its a fact. This game is fucking beautiful. Even if the combat is shit and its short. Its fucking good looking

#20 Edited by millerlight89 (18347 posts) -

@LanceSSJ said:

whether its too linear or short. Ryse is the BEST LOOKING game on either console right now. Its a fact. This game is fucking beautiful. Even if the combat is shit and its short. Its fucking good looking

This thread isn't about what is the best looking console game.

#21 Posted by PrincessGomez92 (3479 posts) -

I would imagine Tomb Raider does. And plus it's got Lara.

#22 Posted by gpuking (2763 posts) -

PS4 Tomb Raider looks better than Ryse, better resolution 1080p, better framerate 60fps, much bigger environment and TressFX. Ryse is 900p, 24fps, very narrow corridor level with pre rendered cutscenes.

Sh*ts on,

#23 Edited by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@gpuking said:

PS4 Tomb Raider looks better than Ryse, better resolution 1080p, better framerate 60fps, much bigger environment and TressFX. Ryse is 900p, 24fps, very narrow corridor level with pre rendered cutscenes.

He didn't ask about the PS4 version. Try Again

Also, Tomb Raider averages under 60fps on the PS4

#24 Posted by gpuking (2763 posts) -

I know he didn't but just saying. also average 50fps is still more than enough to convey my point. PC version also looks better than Ryse while on topic.

#25 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@gpuking said:

I know he didn't but just saying. also average 50fps is still more than enough to convey my point. PC version also looks better than Ryse while on topic.

Oh good, I was afraid you just couldn't read

#26 Posted by wis3boi (31115 posts) -

Why are we still talking about a 4/10 game?

the best peasants can come up with

#27 Edited by MisterXMedia (230 posts) -

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

#28 Posted by misterpmedia (3363 posts) -
#29 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

#30 Posted by MisterXMedia (230 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

#31 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying you can't prove it

#32 Posted by MisterXMedia (230 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying you can't prove it

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

#33 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying you can't prove it

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying that you're full of shit.

#34 Edited by MisterXMedia (230 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying you can't prove it

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying that you're full of shit.

No one's going to make fun of you for switching to the right faction. The grass really is greener here in cow land.

#35 Posted by silversix_ (14075 posts) -

@gpuking said:

PS4 Tomb Raider looks better than Ryse, better resolution 1080p, better framerate 60fps, much bigger environment and TressFX. Ryse is 900p, 24fps, very narrow corridor level with pre rendered cutscenes.

Sh*ts on,

im sorry but these eyes are scary as f*ck. Ryse is a blurry walk in a straight line game with the full power of the Bone (if it even had any) is on Marius's character. Marius looks much better than this ugly lara, everything else in TR shits on Ryse in every way imaginable.

#36 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

@lostrib said:

@MisterXMedia said:

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p with little to no graphical downgrades.

prove it

Xbone is a bigger clusterfuck architecturally than the PS3 was. Xbone will NEVER hit anywhere near 1.1 TF in realworld performance. This is why games don't look last gen.

Games still using prerendered cutscenes and passing them off as in-engine cutscenes. Games still linear as hell. Games still 720p. etc.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying you can't prove it

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

Well that was a rather long winded way of saying that you're full of shit.

No one's going to make fun of you for switching to the right faction. The grass really is greener here in cow land.

And what faction do you suppose I am? And if cow land is specifically PS4, there is not a whole lot over there

#37 Posted by bloodlust_101 (2682 posts) -

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

#38 Edited by leandrro (807 posts) -

Why are we still talking about a 4/10 game?

because its a pretty tech demo disguised as crappy game

#39 Edited by MisterXMedia (230 posts) -

@MisterXMedia said:

Sometimes, the truth is so blatantly obvious that it doesn't warrant a rigorous proof. The Xbone is a last-gen console just like a girl with feminine features is a female.

I don't need her to show me her private parts for me to know she's a female. It's obvious.

If the Xbone is really a man, then I suggest Microsoft reveal it as soon as possible before it's too late.

#40 Posted by eNT1TY (988 posts) -

You don't need the PC version of tomb raider to look better than ryse. TR on xb1 looks better than ryse, runs very fluid (steadier framerate), vastly more open, better lighting (more dynamic), scenes are a lot more complex (populated with more objects), MUCH better animation and environments are teeming with little touches of detail like volumetric dust that reacts to godrays penetrating the jungle canopy, flora swaying to and fro from the wind (all environmental animations are scripted but they do look nice), and consistently great texture detail. Only thing that looks better in Ryse is the main character. Ryse has very inconsistent textures ranging from gorgeous to blurry and low rez often times next to each other (kinda like KZ:SF), environments are flat and sparse except the narrow woodland paths at York that still look comparable (a bit better actually due to are direction but not by much) to TR scenery despite being much smaller and narrower, actual gameplay looks a notch or two lower quality than the exceptional cut scenes which is surprising considering how restrictive, linear, and small actual playable areas are, so many sacrifices and cut corners were made (mostly due to time restrictions) and the end result should have been better, a game that narrow and shallow in scope is supposed to look leagues better than it does, its looks great during sweeping zoomed out camera panoramas only to put you into a tiny box afterwards because it couldn't run those scenes in real time. The water is terrible too except that scripted ocean chop during cutscenes. Torches don't cast shadows on anything (kinda like that neon shit in infamous), a dark cave with multiple assailants donning torches should be a spectacle of dancing lights and shadows but not a single character casts a shadow, not on the floor or the cave walls; in tomb raider when lara has a torch at least herself and other npc's cast shadows . Those are some of the reasons why i have held off buying ryse for full price (the few hours i played were fun but not $60 fun) and await a big discount, it was a lazy effort with more potential than the devs afforded it.

#41 Posted by highking_kallor (512 posts) -

@gamespot4life:

They both suck and are dumbed down for these weak consoles.

#42 Posted by jake44 (1963 posts) -
#43 Posted by ronvalencia (15109 posts) -

@lostrib:

PC's TR has tessellation support which boost triangle count.

#44 Posted by MrXboxOne (742 posts) -

Doesn't matter. Ryse is still the best looking game on any console.

#45 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -

@lostrib:

PC's TR has tessellation support which boost triangle count.

Hmmm, I understood some of those words

#46 Edited by GrenadeLauncher (4092 posts) -

Anything looks better than that turd Ryse.

#47 Edited by AM-Gamer (3580 posts) -

@napo_sp said:

good luck buying a pc that can max tomb raider with 4x SSAA at 1080p or greater first, by this fact alone TR on PC >>> ryse+killzone+infamous+theorder.

LMAO um no, Tomb Raider on PC doesn't even look as good as the PS4 version. Buh buh its got teh tesselation. It also had almost no foilage and it has a static forrest which looks horrid compared to the next gen console versions.

#48 Posted by AM-Gamer (3580 posts) -

@lostrib:

It averages like 55 fps and tops at 60 thats more impressive then sub 30.

#49 Posted by lostrib (34508 posts) -
@AM-Gamer said:

@lostrib:

It averages like 55 fps and tops at 60 thats more impressive then sub 30.

According to DF, the PS4 averages 51 fps with drops to 33 while X1 averages 29.8 fps with drops to 24

#50 Posted by sts106mat (19029 posts) -

@gpuking said:

PS4 Tomb Raider looks better than Ryse, better resolution 1080p, better framerate 60fps, much bigger environment and TressFX. Ryse is 900p, 24fps, very narrow corridor level with pre rendered cutscenes.

Sh*ts on,

why are you such a massive dick that you post screenshots of cut-scenes from tombraider, then compressed shots (from youtube probably) of Ryse gameplay?

butthurt little baby all because killzone doesn't look as good as Ryse.....hahahaha