360 Sells 1.25mil in Nov nearly 2x all other consoles and >Wiiu+Wii combined

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#251 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Remember guys, the 360 had an extra year. The sales of PS3 and 360 is basically tied. By using the logic behind the 360's extra year, the PS3 won.

So, it's Wii > PS3 > 360.

Lems, you've got to admit that you're last.

GamerwillzPS

thats not logic at all, thats what we call stupidity,lol

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

Easy.

The 360's year head start counts.

Wow, that was simpler than I thought.

#252 Posted by clyde46 (45004 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Remember guys, the 360 had an extra year. The sales of PS3 and 360 is basically tied. By using the logic behind the 360's extra year, the PS3 won.

So, it's Wii > PS3 > 360.

Lems, you've got to admit that you're last.

lundy86_4

That would make sense, if that's how we counted it. It's not wrong per se, but it isn't accurate. We go off total sales and notsales within the shortest time period.

29999 posts :P
#253 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Remember guys, the 360 had an extra year. The sales of PS3 and 360 is basically tied. By using the logic behind the 360's extra year, the PS3 won.

So, it's Wii > PS3 > 360.

Lems, you've got to admit that you're last.

GamerwillzPS

thats not logic at all, thats what we call stupidity,lol

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' lol
#254 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]thats not logic at all, thats what we call stupidity,loldelta3074

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' lol

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

#255 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

GamerwillzPS

It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' lol

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

Sold at a faster rate and still either tied or behind the 360.

There is no victory there, especially if you look at the bigger picture (Profit).

#256 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

GamerwillzPS

It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' lol

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.
#257 Posted by sts106mat (19029 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

:lol:

All I'm getting is "Oh gawd! wtf that's stupid! blah blah blah, it's WRONG!!" without any better rebuttal.

Try to counter my argument instead.

GamerwillzPS

It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' lol

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

perhaps that was due to its popularity as a bluray player, it certainly wasn't because of games so...
#258 Posted by lundy86_4 (43010 posts) -

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Remember guys, the 360 had an extra year. The sales of PS3 and 360 is basically tied. By using the logic behind the 360's extra year, the PS3 won.

So, it's Wii > PS3 > 360.

Lems, you've got to admit that you're last.

clyde46

That would make sense, if that's how we counted it. It's not wrong per se, but it isn't accurate. We go off total sales and notsales within the shortest time period.

29999 posts :P

OMG! OMG! OMG! 30,000.

#259 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

That would make sense, if that's how we counted it. It's not wrong per se, but it isn't accurate. We go off total sales and notsales within the shortest time period.

lundy86_4

29999 posts :P

OMG! OMG! OMG! 30,000.

congrats:)
#260 Posted by freedomfreak (39185 posts) -

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

That would make sense, if that's how we counted it. It's not wrong per se, but it isn't accurate. We go off total sales and notsales within the shortest time period.

lundy86_4

29999 posts :P

OMG! OMG! OMG! 30,000.

Congrats! I'm gonna post a present for you in the lounge.
#261 Posted by kuraimen (28078 posts) -
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' loldelta3074

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.

That the PS3 sold at a faster rate is not a matter of if it counts or not. It's a fact...
#262 Posted by Rocker6 (13358 posts) -

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

That would make sense, if that's how we counted it. It's not wrong per se, but it isn't accurate. We go off total sales and notsales within the shortest time period.

lundy86_4

29999 posts :P

OMG! OMG! OMG! 30,000.

No-life loser confirmed!

[spoiler] Congrats! ;) [/spoiler]

#263 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]It's not logical to completely erase a years worth of sales numbers just because a console came out a year earlier, shall we erase all the Ps2 sales that happened before the Xbox released last gen? 360's first year sales count, whether you like it or not, what you are saying is very, very childish 'i can't win this so i will move the goal posts' loldelta3074

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.

So, you moved the goal posts in order to win?

That's what I would measure. It makes sense. We marked the beginning of the generation with the 360 which is the 1st console to enter and then we look at how well all the consoles were selling. The PS3 and 360 are tied, but the 360 had an extra year so this tells me that PS3 was selling better, therefore it already secured the 2nd place.

#264 Posted by sts106mat (19029 posts) -
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

kuraimen
If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.

That the PS3 sold at a faster rate is not a matter of if it counts or not. It's a fact...

agreed, but whooping it about as something impressive is lol time. compared with the ps2, ps3 has been a disaster for sony, compared to the original xbox. for MS the 360 has been a huge success and continues to surprise (see thread OP). surely you can agree
#265 Posted by NineTailedGoku (1927 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

RR360DD

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

Most of which came out in 2007. Dont kid yourself, its advertisement plain and simple.

#266 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

GamerwillzPS

If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.

So, you moved the goal posts in order to win?

That's what I would measure. It makes sense. We marked the beginning of the generation with the 360 which is the 1st console to enter and then we look at how well all the consoles were selling. The PS3 and 360 are tied, but the 360 had an extra year so this tells me that PS3 was selling better, therefore it already secured the 2nd place.

You're the one moving the goal posts by saying "but the PS3 sold at a faster rate!"

The fact of the matter is, the PS3 tied a number in November (with combined PS2 sales apparently but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt) a number the 360 hit at the end of September. All indications show that the PS3 moved less units this month than the 360.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon (that was intentional, btw) to figure out that the math favors the 360.

But yeah, let's keep on moving those goal posts!

Face facts kiddo. The PS3 is still in last place.

#267 Posted by Puckhog04 (22606 posts) -

The Wii U came out Nov 18th...so that's a bit late to even count. On top of that, it's still sold out 99% of places. So another unfair comparison. As for the Wii...it still sells. But most are moving onto the Wii U. MS's next console won't be out for at least another 10-12 months.

#268 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

NineTailedGoku

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

Most of which came out in 2007. Dont kid yourself, its advertisement plain and simple.

Many, not most.

And who cares? The 360 still has the better library of games when compared to the PS3 by any objective measure.

#269 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.The_Game21x

So, you moved the goal posts in order to win?

That's what I would measure. It makes sense. We marked the beginning of the generation with the 360 which is the 1st console to enter and then we look at how well all the consoles were selling. The PS3 and 360 are tied, but the 360 had an extra year so this tells me that PS3 was selling better, therefore it already secured the 2nd place.

The fact of the matter is, the PS3 tied a number in November (with combined PS2 sales apparently but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt) a number the 360 hit at the end of September. All indications show that the PS3 moved less units this month than the 360.

You're talking about the US sales? If so, I'll take it with a grain of salt.

The US is nothing. Worldwide sales is how we should look at it. The PS3 is dominating by brute force in the EU and Asia, those continents has bigger markets.

In conclusion, enjoy the last place.

#270 Posted by FastEddie2121 (3081 posts) -

The Wii U came out Nov 18th...so that's a bit late to even count. On top of that, it's still sold out 99% of places. So another unfair comparison. As for the Wii...it still sells. But most are moving onto the Wii U. MS's next console won't be out for at least another 10-12 months.

Puckhog04

Not really.

#271 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

So, you moved the goal posts in order to win?

That's what I would measure. It makes sense. We marked the beginning of the generation with the 360 which is the 1st console to enter and then we look at how well all the consoles were selling. The PS3 and 360 are tied, but the 360 had an extra year so this tells me that PS3 was selling better, therefore it already secured the 2nd place.

GamerwillzPS

The fact of the matter is, the PS3 tied a number in November (with combined PS2 sales apparently but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt) a number the 360 hit at the end of September. All indications show that the PS3 moved less units this month than the 360.

You're talking about the US sales? If so, I'll take it with a grain of salt.

The US is nothing. Worldwide sales is how we should look at it. The PS3 is dominating by brute force in the EU and Asia, those continents has bigger markets.

In conclusion, enjoy the last place.

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

#272 Posted by Puckhog04 (22606 posts) -

[QUOTE="Puckhog04"]

The Wii U came out Nov 18th...so that's a bit late to even count. On top of that, it's still sold out 99% of places. So another unfair comparison. As for the Wii...it still sells. But most are moving onto the Wii U. MS's next console won't be out for at least another 10-12 months.

FastEddie2121

Not really.

Yes, they literally started getting them in. I know the managers at a few of my local gamestops. There's a huge waiting list at each Gamestop. Also, now call and ask how quick they're selling out...because my local ones can't keep them in stock though there is a ready supply being shipped.

#273 Posted by kuraimen (28078 posts) -

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

The_Game21x

Most of which came out in 2007. Dont kid yourself, its advertisement plain and simple.

Many, not most.

And who cares? The 360 still has the better library of games when compared to the PS3 by any objective measure.

LMFAO... yeah no.
#274 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

The fact of the matter is, the PS3 tied a number in November (with combined PS2 sales apparently but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt) a number the 360 hit at the end of September. All indications show that the PS3 moved less units this month than the 360.

The_Game21x

You're talking about the US sales? If so, I'll take it with a grain of salt.

The US is nothing. Worldwide sales is how we should look at it. The PS3 is dominating by brute force in the EU and Asia, those continents has bigger markets.

In conclusion, enjoy the last place.

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

#275 Posted by jimmypsn (4425 posts) -

Every year we get this from the cows. And every year it doesn't happen. Sad sight to see. It's like watching a football game and they are the losing players on the field still believe they should have won when everyone in the stands have already left.

#276 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course, 360's first year sales should definitely count but the sales between both consoles is tied which indicates that PS3 was selling at a faster rate. Clear victory here.

GamerwillzPS

If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.

So, you moved the goal posts in order to win?

That's what I would measure. It makes sense. We marked the beginning of the generation with the 360 which is the 1st console to enter and then we look at how well all the consoles were selling. The PS3 and 360 are tied, but the 360 had an extra year so this tells me that PS3 was selling better, therefore it already secured the 2nd place.

How did i move the goal posts? i Left them where they are supposed to be in the First Place, we have always used overall hardware sales, you are the one trying to change the rules and move the goal posts, not me sunshine, how you would measure it has is irrlevent and it makes perfect sense to go by Overall hardware sales, the games industry does so why shouldn't we, like you said, the Generation started wiith the 360, going buy your logic if a Sprinter misses the gun and starts the Race late yet still manages to Tie with the lead runner that he has won the Race, do you see wher youyr logic is flawed now?
#277 Posted by Heil68 (43465 posts) -
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="delta3074"]If we actually measured it by that then yes, but we don't so NO, we count overall hardware sales.sts106mat
That the PS3 sold at a faster rate is not a matter of if it counts or not. It's a fact...

agreed,

And that should /thread. Thank you Sony.
#278 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

You're talking about the US sales? If so, I'll take it with a grain of salt.

The US is nothing. Worldwide sales is how we should look at it. The PS3 is dominating by brute force in the EU and Asia, those continents has bigger markets.

In conclusion, enjoy the last place.

GamerwillzPS

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?
#279 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

delta3074

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?

Wrong.

Link.

#280 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

delta3074

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

in 2011

were in 2012 headed into 2013
#281 Posted by todd2r_Partdeux (780 posts) -

[QUOTE="FastEddie2121"]

[QUOTE="Puckhog04"]

The Wii U came out Nov 18th...so that's a bit late to even count. On top of that, it's still sold out 99% of places. So another unfair comparison. As for the Wii...it still sells. But most are moving onto the Wii U. MS's next console won't be out for at least another 10-12 months.

Puckhog04

Not really.

Yes, they literally started getting them in. I know the managers at a few of my local gamestops. There's a huge waiting list at each Gamestop. Also, now call and ask how quick they're selling out...because my local ones can't keep them in stock though there is a ready supply being shipped.

Where in the blue hell do you live? WiiUs are everywhere. Best buy, target, Walmart, GameStop, etc, etc. there's no problem finding one.
#282 Posted by Mozelleple112 (6628 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

RR360DD

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.
#283 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

Mozelleple112

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.

Quoted for the truth.

#284 Posted by clyde46 (45004 posts) -
 .
#285 Posted by Heil68 (43465 posts) -

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

GamerwillzPS

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.

Quoted for the truth.

and again for dramatic effect.
#286 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

GamerwillzPS

yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?

Wrong.

Link.

WRONG SONYs own Fiscal reports http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461642 2011 Xbox 360=14.9 million units Ps3=14.1 million units Notice the date on your article is 2 months BEFORE the end of 2011,Explain? how can you tell which one sold the most in 2011 2 months before the end of 2011? i am waiting, this will be good,lol
#287 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Alright, prove it.

Let's see some proof that the PS3 is "dominating" in Europe and Asia enough to close the gap and surpass the 360.

delta3074

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?

This.

Even if the PS3 sells slightly better than the 360 in Europe, the 360's commanding lead in the US is more than enough to balance it out.

#288 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

PinnacleGamingP
in 2011

were in 2012 headed into 2013

Totally out of context with the converstion, nothing new,lol
#289 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

Mozelleple112

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.

Prove it.

#290 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?delta3074

Wrong.

Link.

WRONG SONYs own Fiscal reports http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461642 2011 Xbox 360=14.9 million units Ps3=14.1 million units Notice the date on your article is 2 months BEFORE the end of 2011,Explain? how can you tell which one sold the most in 2011 2 months before the end of 2011? i am waiting, this will be good,lol

:lol: "sonys own report" neogaf.com
#291 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

1.26m for no games and Xbox Live fees. Can someone explain clearly to me why?

Mozelleple112

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.

You talk a right load of rubbish, the 360 has MORE games than the Ps3 you muppet, Twice the amount of game my backside,How do you explian the Fact that the 360 has more multiplats than the Ps3?
#292 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Wrong.

Link.

PinnacleGamingP
WRONG SONYs own Fiscal reports http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461642 2011 Xbox 360=14.9 million units Ps3=14.1 million units Notice the date on your article is 2 months BEFORE the end of 2011,Explain? how can you tell which one sold the most in 2011 2 months before the end of 2011? i am waiting, this will be good,lol

:lol: "sonys own report" neogaf.com

did you even read it, they actually have a copy of SONY's fiscal reports on the First page you muppet, god damn you are stupid dude.
#293 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="delta3074"]WRONG SONYs own Fiscal reports http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461642 2011 Xbox 360=14.9 million units Ps3=14.1 million units Notice the date on your article is 2 months BEFORE the end of 2011,Explain? how can you tell which one sold the most in 2011 2 months before the end of 2011? i am waiting, this will be good,lol

:lol: "sonys own report" neogaf.com

did you even read it, they actually have a copy of SONY's fiscal reports on the First page you muppet, god damn you are stupid dude.

so their source is legit. wheres theres source?
#294 Posted by kuraimen (28078 posts) -

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Console with the best library (according to both gamespot and metacritic), best online service, best controller, best multiplats .....

Seems like a good reason to buy the 360;)

GamerwillzPS

But the PS3 controller is better, its library is twice as big as the 360s, and has more exclusives than the Wii (360 is last of course) And a blu-ray player and free online, and PSN+, seems like no reason to buy 360.

Quoted for the truth.

Re-quoted for the truth
#295 Posted by GamerwillzPS (8530 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Here we go. Remember to check out the charts in some of these links. They worth thousands of words.

Link - 2011 sales

Link - 2012 sales

Link- Japan

Admit it, the PS3 is a better operating console for the majority of the world. The only place where the 360 have dominated is the US, which is nothing. You simply cannot claim victory from that.

The_Game21x

yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?

This.

Even if the PS3 sells slightly better than the 360 in Europe, the 360's commanding lead in the US is more than enough to balance it out.

Yet you didn't provide any evidence to point out that the 360 sold better.

I have provided enough to show that you are all wrong. PS3 sold better in the overall worldwide sales, I already proved it and you haven't. Or is it too much for you to accept?

I repeat, the US is nothing. Typical Americans thinking the world is covered by their land... No, it doesn't. There are continents out there. There are different countries out there that has better tastes than you Americans.

#296 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"] :lol: "sonys own report" neogaf.com

did you even read it, they actually have a copy of SONY's fiscal reports on the First page you muppet, god damn you are stupid dude.

so their source is legit. wheres theres source?

'Originally Posted by Sony Corporation' second line after the first graph, Can you even read dude?
#297 Posted by delta3074 (17897 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?GamerwillzPS

This.

Even if the PS3 sells slightly better than the 360 in Europe, the 360's commanding lead in the US is more than enough to balance it out.

Yet you didn't provide any evidence to point out that the 360 sold better.

I have provided enough to show that you are all wrong. PS3 sold better in the overall worldwide sales, I already proved it and you haven't. Or is it too much for you to accept?

I repeat, the US is nothing. Typical Americans thinking the world is covered by their land... No, it doesn't. There are continents out there. There are different countries out there that has better tastes than you Americans.

yet the 360 still ousold the Ps3 worldwide in 2011 which makes you evidence a moot point, and sorry, but to claim the Ps3 outsold the 360 worldwide in 2011 using an article from October 2011,two months before 2011 even ended is just plain stupid really, you should check the dates on your articles before posting,lol
#298 Posted by Fizzman (9869 posts) -

Cows are hilarious. The numbers are exactly in line with the numbers reported last year and the 360 ended up outselling the PS3 WW in 2011. 2012 wont be any different. Another victory for the 360 and another year where cows make up excuses why the PS3 cant overtake the 360.

#299 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]yet the 360 ousold the Ps3 worldwide by 600,00 units in 2011, that would mean that NA and UK sales of the 360 where more than enough to secure the 360 first place in worldwide sales would it not?GamerwillzPS

This.

Even if the PS3 sells slightly better than the 360 in Europe, the 360's commanding lead in the US is more than enough to balance it out.

Yet you didn't provide any evidence to point out that the 360 sold better.

I have provided enough to show that you are all wrong. PS3 sold better in the overall worldwide sales, I already proved it and you haven't. Or is it too much for you to accept?

I repeat, the US is nothing. Typical Americans thinking the world is covered by their land... No, it doesn't. There are continents out there. There are different countries out there that has better tastes than you Americans.

No you haven't. You've shown me a bunch of charts from Europe and Japan, not any definitive numbers that show the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide this year or last, and as delta already linked, last year, the PS3 sold less than the 360 worldwide.

I like how you immediately descend into America bashing and making blanket statements about people saying their land covers all (when no one here has even hinted at that) and making other baseless assumptions about the tastes of gamers worldwide compared to Americans. You're a joke. I love how you America bashers consistently make yourselves look worse than the people you're bashing. Good job on that one.

Show me some actual numbers that prove your case that the PS3 has overtaken the 360 worldwide or sit down and be quiet.

#300 Posted by lundy86_4 (43010 posts) -

:lol: "sonys own report" neogaf.comPinnacleGamingP

They consolidated the results and listed the full report within the post. Are you stupid?