Yes I did and I didnt attack the authors for being a part of a minority group I attacked them for being activist. Even Zaryia conceded on that study. They were not an unbiased source.
The legislation they try to pass says otherwise. If you want to go around calling " real women" cis women than have at it.
These are not immeasurable things I'm listing. They didn't eliminate all variables. For an example are they analyzing body cam footage during traffic stops? Are they analyzing the criminal records of the suspects? These studies were not consistent with this data. I would like real solutions to the problems as opposed to to just blaming everything on the lazy excuse of racism.
Male=Man Female =Women . You can dance around that immeasurable fact all you want. If your argument is one can unnaturally jack themselves up with hormones to change their bone structure to appeal more masculine or feminine I'm not sure how that helps your argument.
Yes the studies analyzed and factored in these studies. Still show that people of certain races are disproportionally targeted.
Read the Merriam Webbster again. And you will see that nothing you said contradicts trans women being women and trans men being men. Either way, the core of our disagreement is that I say that what defines a man or woman is based on gender while you seem to imply it is based on sex. Unfortunately for you. Both the dictionary and medical literature use gender, when defining man or woman.
Log in to comment