Video: 9/11 Firefighters Reveal Huge Explosions Before Towers Collapsed

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
October 6, 2010

Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.

Debunkers have repeatedly claimed that low-temperature burning jet fuel could weaken steel support columns enough to cause the pancake-****collapse of the twin towers, ignoring the plethora of eyewitness testimony to incendiary devices having caused the implosion of the World Trade Center structure.

The new tape is as clear cut as it comes – the firefighters, who were inside the lobby of one of the towers, unequivocally state that secondary explosions which occurred after the planes hit were responsible for causing the towers to collapse.

"There was an explosion….the third explosion the whole lobby collapsed on us," states the firefighter. Asked "was that a secondary explosion," he responds, "yes it was ….definitely secondary explosion".

Another firefighter then confirms that there were at least three explosions which caused the lobby to collapse.

The only way to explain what firefighters described as "molten steel, like you're in a foundary, like lava" being witnessed following the collapse of the towers was if powerful additional incendiary devices were used to take down the buildings.

Click on link for video

http://www.infowars.com/video-911-firefighters-reveal-huge-explosions-before-towers-collapsed/

*Sees Info Wars as source*

Yeah, I'll pass.

Something not right here. not legit imo.

Tbh, I don't know what to believe anymore...

So where is the theory of Fire fighters testimony of hearing secondary explosions before the towers collapsed?

Hmm.

I have to ask the obvious question: where were these explosions? At ground level?

Of course there were explosions before the collapse. Do people think they would come after? This conspiracy crap has to stop.

Something not right here. not legit imo.

Overlord93

the video looks pretty legit to me. anyways i agree with above poster. the explosion sound could have been caused by falling objects

This video was released by NIST- the federal technology agency that works with industry to develop and apply technology, measurements, and standards.

Only because of a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act.

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

BMD004

I'm with Noam Chumsky on this one: 9/11 conspiracy theories are stupid and it's probably the government feeding us these to keep our attention from real issues.funsohng

lol those who still believe it was terrorists are having a laugh! if you still believe this their brainwashing techniques are greatFreshPrinceUk

What I don't understand, is that if it was really a controlled demolition, then don't you think these firefighters would know that? There is a difference between a few explosions that happen inside of a building that is on fire (such as the fire reaching a diesel generator or something), and the explosions used to create an implosion.

There are a hell of a lot more explosions in a controlled demolition.. and they all happen around the same time. If you've seen an implosion, it goes like this: boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom...

all in the matter of idk.. 10 seconds?

Hmm.

I have to ask the obvious question: where were these explosions? At ground level?

GabuEx

Maybe this will help

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Hmm.

I have to ask the obvious question: where were these explosions? At ground level?

sgotskillz

Maybe this will help

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

LOL@ the scary music in the beginning

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

BMD004

like what, this isn't a military ammo dump

guys u should do some serious research you shall find......the truth. haha terrorists.... yeah they had me tricked for a couple of years aswellFreshPrinceUk

Why don't people do thing to help humans do better in the future instead of looking into the past and finding problems that were 9 years ago. If we do things that do better for us, it will prevent a lot of trouble in the future... instead we ignore that. -Sigh-

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

Deano

like what, this isn't a military ammo dump

[QUOTE="funsohng"]I'm with Noam Chumsky on this one: 9/11 conspiracy theories are stupid and it's probably the government feeding us these to keep our attention from real issues.xaos

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

Deano

like what, this isn't a military ammo dump

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

Deano

like what, this isn't a military ammo dump

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60

george bush also claimed to have seen the first plane crash on TV, except there was no TV coverage of the first plane.

it's ridiculous people try and claim the govt. wasn't involved in any way.

I think like pearl harbour they knew about it before hand but chose to let it happen, war is good for military companies it's in their interest to create them.

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Hmm.

I have to ask the obvious question: where were these explosions? At ground level?

sgotskillz

Maybe this will help

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

I asked a yes or no question; why are you posting a video to answer a yes or no question?

[QUOTE="Deano"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

What does this prove? There are things inside of buildings that can explode...

Pirate700

like what, this isn't a military ammo dump

Explain the squibs popping out systematically as the towers collapsed?

Here is the clip again incase you missed it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

So if this really was a damning video that proved that the government did 9/11, I'm pretty sure the government would have blocked its release. Not only that, the video probably wouldn't even exist.gameguy6700

in the matter of idk.. 10 seconds?BMD004

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60

george bush also claimed to have seen the first plane crash on TV, except there was no TV coverage of the first plane.

it's ridiculous people try and claim the govt. wasn't involved in any way.

I think like pearl harbour they knew about it before hand but chose to let it happen, war is good for military companies it's in their interest to create them.

Deano

Generators? Water heaters/boilers? Gas lines? Large capacitors throughout the building's electrical system?savebattery

apart from a gas line none of that explodes.

i'm not even aware of gas lines being in any office towers i've been in either.

guys u should do some serious research you shall find......the truth. haha terrorists.... yeah they had me tricked for a couple of years aswellFreshPrinceUk

Alex Jones doesn't count as a credible source for research.

That is really reaching. What he obviously meant by it is that he walked into the classroom and saw that a plane had hit the towers. It doesn't mean he literally saw the moment of impact. Seriously, wtf? I guarantee you that you say things like that ALL OF THE TIME that aren't 100% true but people know exactly what you meant by it. The only difference is that you are not on TV and people aren't trying to hang on to every word that came out of your mouth and analyze exactly what you said. BMD004

you didn't even watch it because footage of the first plane impacting from a guy filming someone unrelated on the street didn't even surface till the NEXT DAY.

I'm still convinced there's more to 9/11 than the public knows. People are naive if they think there are extremely corrupted people in power or who have the power to pull strings.

Most people seem to think it had to have been a huge cover-up when in reality it wouldn't have to be that big of an operation in terms of the need-to-know people.

Too many cheese bit holes for me to ignore personally.

[QUOTE="sgotskillz"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Hmm.

I have to ask the obvious question: where were these explosions? At ground level?

GabuEx

Maybe this will help

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

I asked a yes or no question; why are you posting a video to answer a yes or no question?

Yes.

Multiple witnesses heard explosions in the lobby just before the towers collapsed.

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"] So if this really was a damning video that proved that the government did 9/11, I'm pretty sure the government would have blocked its release. Not only that, the video probably wouldn't even exist.raynimrod

in the matter of idk.. 10 seconds?BMD004

Countless video cameras around the perimeter of the petagon, gas stations, hotels, Highway cameras.

Were all these turned off that day?

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="sgotskillz"]

Maybe this will help

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

sgotskillz

I asked a yes or no question; why are you posting a video to answer a yes or no question?

Yes.

Multiple witnesses heard explosions in the lobby just before the towers collapsed.

OK, cool. Now then...

Here's a close-up of WTC 2 right before collapse:

Here it's starting to collapse. Note how only the portion above the fire line from the plane is moving:

Here it's really starting to collapse. Note how the portion above the fire line is tilting and falling into the building:

These are all still images taken from this footage.

Notice as well that the rest of the building began to collapse after the top portion above where the plane hit it fell on top of it.

Please tell me how explosions in the lobby caused only the portion of the building above where the plane struck to tilt over and fall into the rest of the building and then caused the building to fall down from the top down.

Maybe Alex Jones is behind 9/11, so he can get hits to his site and get ad revenue and sell stuff on this site. He seems to know alot about it. :P

[QUOTE="savebattery"] Generators? Water heaters/boilers? Gas lines? Large capacitors throughout the building's electrical system?Deano

apart from a gas line none of that explodes.

i'm not even aware of gas lines being in any office towers i've been in either.

Generators, and water heaters boilers do explode, and there are gas lines that are in buildings. Gas is a way to heat buildings.

[QUOTE="savebattery"] Generators? Water heaters/boilers? Gas lines? Large capacitors throughout the building's electrical system?Deano

apart from a gas line none of that explodes.

i'm not even aware of gas lines being in any office towers i've been in either.

they didn't explain how WT7 collapsed either, it wasn't even hit and had just a few small fires on some of the floors, yet the whole thing collapsed.

it was also reported as well by the media that it has collapsed even while it was still visible and standing.

Looks like the terrorists have a new way to fight us-instead of firing at their attackers, they make their enemies' people question their own governments. Even if it's just a stupid conspiracy that no one will believe.

they didn't explain how WT7 collapsed either, it wasn't even hit and had just a few small fires on some of the floors, yet the whole thing collapsed.

it was also reported as well by the media that it has collapsed even while it was still visible and standing.

Deano

No conspiracy theorist has ever explained why in the world they would have made WTC7 collapse when WTC1 and WTC2 - the two actually recognizable buildings from the complex - had already gone down.

Capacitors, generators, and boilers don't explode?savebattery

no they'd just melt.

[QUOTE="Deano"]

they didn't explain how WT7 collapsed either, it wasn't even hit and had just a few small fires on some of the floors, yet the whole thing collapsed.

it was also reported as well by the media that it has collapsed even while it was still visible and standing.

GabuEx

No conspiracy theorist has ever explained why in the world they would have made WTC7 collapse when WTC1 and WTC2 - the two actually recognizable buildings from the complex - had already gone down.

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="Deano"]

they didn't explain how WT7 collapsed either, it wasn't even hit and had just a few small fires on some of the floors, yet the whole thing collapsed.

it was also reported as well by the media that it has collapsed even while it was still visible and standing.

Mystic-G

No conspiracy theorist has ever explained why in the world they would have made WTC7 collapse when WTC1 and WTC2 - the two actually recognizable buildings from the complex - had already gone down.

What information? It was an office building. There was nothing secret about its contents.