first cod4: modern warfare wii screens

[QUOTE="FPS1337"][QUOTE="TaMuK711"]

LOL, right :lol:

Also, this game looks fairly rough, so far...

[QUOTE="FFCYAN"]

[QUOTE="FPS1337"] If you say the conduit has bad visuals then ur an idiot. The one thing every review I saw including gamespot's said the conduit's visual were great. FPS1337

Also, this game looks fairly rough, so far...

Here is a few words from the ACTUAL REVIEW:

"As fine as The Conduit performs technically, the lousy art makes it an eyesore at times. The levels blend together because they all have the same drab color scheme and no memorable landmarks. The enemies could have been ripped from any number of science fiction stories and are based on an unimaginative insect design that would be impossible to pick out of a lineup. It's a shame the art direction couldn't have matched the impressive technology because what could have"

Technically, The Conduit is good. Artistically, it's ugly as sin. Technical graphics on the Wii are not anything great because the other systems do them better. However, games that look great artistically can "look" better or comparable to the PS3/360 because great art design has no hardware limitations.

What angers me the most is that they are releasing it now, they should of done this in 2007, releasing it similtaneously with the other versions.

We should be getting Modern Warfare 2, not this. Is there a problem with making a exclusive COD game for Wii?

snover2009

What angers me the most is that they are releasing it now, they should of done this in 2007, releasing it similtaneously with the other versions.

We should be getting Modern Warfare 2, not this. Is there a problem with making a exclusive COD game for Wii?

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]it's as awfully bad as i predicted. seriously, wtf >_>FPS1337

still, i gotta admit that dust (probably caused by a missile explosion) looked good... well it didnt suck like the rest of the pic.

[QUOTE="FPS1337"][QUOTE="FFCYAN"]GS bashed The Conduit in the artistic department, enought to earn it the Busted Graphics, Artistic emblem. If you are gonna troll and insult people, at least make it look less obvious, jeez.:?

Also, this game looks fairly rough, so far...

FFCYAN

Here is a few words from the ACTUAL REVIEW:

"As fine as The Conduit performs technically, the lousy art makes it an eyesore at times. The levels blend together because they all have the same drab color scheme and no memorable landmarks. The enemies could have been ripped from any number of science fiction stories and are based on an unimaginative insect design that would be impossible to pick out of a lineup. It's a shame the art direction couldn't have matched the impressive technology because what could have"

Technically, The Conduit is good. Artistically, it's ugly as sin. Technical graphics on the Wii are not anything great because the other systems do them better. However, games that look great artistically can "look" better or comparable to the PS3/360 because great art design has no hardware limitations.

They can do better than that.

I'd need to see a gameplay video before I decide whether the graphpics are ok or terrible

I'd need to see a gameplay video before I decide whether the graphpics are ok or terrible

jessmaster13

same here.Honestly, its looking very good for a pre alpha.Stop the inquisition and the "lets search desperately the worst looking screenshot and compare to the best possible screenshot of a gc game". Seriously.Sure its not looking perfect, but for a pre alpha is expected.I need motion to judge like any honest player(not a screenshot hunter). As i said before the details were announced, theres improvement over the succesful WAW: 2 extra online players. Improvement. this is from activision - Treyarch has kept optimizing the CoD4 engine and is one of the reasons for the port. Graphical improvements in some texture resolution, general performance, new particle effects. Runs at 30 fps like Call of Duty: World at War.Thank you. -AS i predicted: THE DLC is included. -All gameplay features included from PC version .No cuts like waw. So its a better game than waw ,but it came 2 years later. But i rather get a GOOD game later than a chopped up port now.intro94

It looks worse than most GameCube and PS2 games - how is that a good thing?

And the reason why Modern Warfare looked as good as it did on other platforms is because it runs silky smooth in 60 FPS, much like Metroid Prime 3.

This runs in 30FPS.

no haziq.dont make me search for ps2 and gc random screenshots.I know i will find mostly horrid samples that look much worse than this.intro94

Really? I'm pretty sure I could find screenshots of GCN and [maybe, no, probably] PS2 games that make this "effort" look like junk. For a game that was marveled for its design on the other systems, this Wii installment looks horrible. There's no excuse for this. None. The fact that there are even those who are defending this game for one reason or another baffles me. Not only is it two years late, but it doesn't look like much is being done to make this game stand out from the pack. Well, unless they want it to stand out by looking absolutely horrendous...

no haziq.dont make me search for ps2 and gc random screenshots.I know i will find mostly horrid samples that look much worse than this.intro94

A lot of gamecube games look better than this ... Even older COD games on the GameCube look better.

Thats COD on a PSP ... which looks better and less bland then the Wii game.

TimeSplitters 3 for the GameCube, looks better than MW Wii.

Compared to something like Red Steel 2 and Metroid Prime 3 - this looks like crap.

Time splitters 3?please dont talk like if i didnt play that(and every other game you mentioned) millions of times,gameplay of those games have terrible graphics even against WAW.Specially Timesplitters .To add insult to injury, i have a PSP and even COD3 for wii has better drawing distance than the PSP game.Red steel 2,maybe,thats a whole different beast of a different generation.Time splitter 3 and RS2 in the same sentence?ridiculous. Seriously, all the reviews (even gamespot),went on to mentionthe satisfactory graphics of WAW. If you really think the graphics were that bad and worse than last gen, dont you think it would have worth a mention INSTEAD of saying they looked good?.If MW looks better than WAW, is even harder to make those statements have sense and we would conclude that 90 percent of gaming critics are fans of the the wii.Something i honestly find hard to agree.As i said, dont try to do the screenshots war.I said i dont care about searching the worst and the best sc of each game to make a newer game look worse(at least gameplay vidoes make sense, but screenshots?), based on the hate for a company or something.Specially when i played all those games myself for a long time.

Those pictures look like a gamecube game, but apparently its beta so I shouldn't be too quick to judge. The only thing that interests me in this is my hopes for additional content in the single player because I couldn't care less about the multiplayer since this games coming out around the same time as MW2 for my 360.

Those pictures look like a gamecube game, but apparently its beta so I shouldn't be too quick to judge. The only thing that interests me in this is my hopes for additional content in the single player because I couldn't care less about the multiplayer since this games coming out around the same time as MW2 for my 360.

ColdP1zza