While I can see using some of these things after you complete a game and want to try something new with it, if you use these for a game before then, the game probably sucks. If you don't enjoy it enough to play it through, why bother with it?
Maybe they already paid for it and want to siphon as much fun out of the now-unsatisfactory product as they can. Nothing wrong with that. I don't understand the benefit of looking at someone else' gaming situation through the lens of my own values.
My issue with the trailer wasn't the gore. It was the lack of context as to what was going on, why, and who it was happening to. I think if people had more context to resonate with, their flights of fancy and political/social ideologies wouldn't have so much ground to run away with.
Do what I do. I toot the horn at the announcement of the game. Then, I forget about it until it's released. I'm not the type to watch paint dry, meaning I don't sit around waiting for a game. It'll release when it's ready for release.
I'm just not into hype.
Same here. There's no issue for me considering the quintillion quality games that are coming out in the meanwhile, and that's on top of all the buried gems I'd never gotten around to.
You know Cyberpunk's gonna be quality. Let them do their thing and release it whenever.
@zombieproof: But if I respond, I get to talk about RE4 with normal people like you. And I really like talking about RE4. (also, I think I really nailed the Ferrari metaphor)
Fair enough brah and yeah, you nailed the analogy dead-bang lol
everything evil within 2 did better than resi 4 except the hub system which is kinda boring but when it go to linear structure its good. plus its also miles ahead of resi 5 and 6.
I knew your reply was gonna be dumb, and who brought up resident evil's 5 and 6 jackass?
i still respect you even if you call me jackass. because if i call you name. there wouldnot be any different between you and me my dear friend.
other than how its a dumb reply? evil within 2 have better gameplay mechanics. resi 4 mechanics were mediocre and that you cant walk while shoot was even more dumb plus game was full of QTE. didnot like entire game built on saving president daughter. i couldnot finish it. on other hand im on chapter 13 on TEW2. its not perfect game. or masterpiece. but a really good third person survival horror game.
Well I don't respect you. I've long since given up any attempts at "discussing" anything with you because there is never any exchange of ideas. You speak only in hyperbole. You're stuck on the level of "what" you feel. It never evolves to the nuance of why or how (barring your sexist inclination to hate on anything with women) like an actual discussion is supposed to and when you're not throwing around baseless hyperbole, you either ignore logic that rebuts your idiocy or just counter it with more baseless hyperbole.
You're a shitposter and the passive aggresive use of "my friend" does nothing to change that.
@zombieproof: But if I respond, I get to talk about RE4 with normal people like you. And I really like talking about RE4. (also, I think I really nailed the Ferrari metaphor)
Fair enough brah and yeah, you nailed the analogy dead-bang lol
everything evil within 2 did better than resi 4 except the hub system which is kinda boring but when it go to linear structure its good. plus its also miles ahead of resi 5 and 6.
I knew your reply was gonna be dumb, and who brought up resident evil's 5 and 6 jackass?
@zombieproof: But if I respond, I get to talk about RE4 with normal people like you. And I really like talking about RE4. (also, I think I really nailed the Ferrari metaphor)
Fair enough brah and yeah, you nailed the analogy dead-bang lol
Log in to comment