@farshidhss Add everything wrong with this game (and there's quite a bit, he makes excellent point), and there's no way it goes to _4_. That's absolutely ridiculous.
What is the added value to readers, to publishing such a slamming review of this game, NOW ? If only to "pad" the "content offer" of the site?
Everybody visiting this site has either already played it, or has a pretty solid opinion of it already. This new review is not adding any value for any reader, period. It's there to generate clicks, it's there to kick off the new site and the new rating system with some controversy.
I understand the concept of reviewers disagreeing, guys. However, I also understand the concept of a professional website, or any media outlet, having a specific set of guidelines for how they do reviews. If the "subjective" part of the reviewing process can yield such a HUGE gap as someone giving it a 9, and someone else giving it a 4, that has ZERO credibility in my eyes. It means that any kind of objective criteria are virtually unaccounted for.
@Jamoid @goldeneye19 How can a website have any credibility if there is SO MUCH discrepancy between two reviews. And more importantly, why revisit Bioshock Infinite now ?! Why not start this with a brand new game? To make sure not to upset PR people? Or to make sure that negative reviews don't impact sales enough that sites get blacklisted? Come on, this is an absolute waste of time.
What about the Game Collection / Wish List / Now Playing feature? Will that still be around? I've been using Gamespot the most to track my collection; if it won't stay, it would be nice to be able to export that data.
@PJthePlayer2 @yboucher @pboontap yes, and we all know that these forums constitute the cream of the crop of humanity. You've got a lot more "enlightenment" to go dish out on said forums; off you go.
yboucher's comments