am I supposed to see any difference?

I remember a game in the mid 80's where you controlled a little fat plumber whose story was some ridiculous afterthought about saving a princess who was kidnapped by a giant turtle. According to this article, that game should be terrible. And yet that game managed to be a groundbreaking success cause it had plenty of challenging, meticulously designed levels and amazingly tight controls. This teaches a lesson that gameplay alone is everything that a game needs to be great. Games are not supposed to rely too much on story. Like a guy here already said, if you just want to watch a story, go to the books, cinema or theaters. Gaming is just not for you.

don't understand all the fuss about Half-Life 2's greatness. IMHO, hl2 was a mediocre shooter, with mediocre gunplay and an excess of scripted events always interrupting the gameplay. The fact that it had a good story doesn't save it from being a mediocre game.

come on, the only difference are due to contrast and brightness, which depends on your tv, not the consoles

only morons make sli or crossfire. total waste of money

nobody will need more than an 8800gt for the next five years

The only difference between the images lies on contrast and color saturation, which depends on the TV, not the consoles. Silly comparison.

Silly comparison. All images are absolutely identical. You need to have kind of a bionic eye to tell any difference. Don´t know what they're trying to get with such nitpicks.

graphics are absolutely identical on all 3 platforms. Another silly comparison by Gamespot