@msfan1289 @Gamer_4_Fun

If that were true, it wouldn't explain why you only need one per console. Make sense?

@King_Wii @jenovaschilld

PC is certainly a more flexible machine, but this doesn't always translate to being the most advanced.

@msfan1289 @Poodger @Whole-Lotta

I'll resist pointing out the self-censorship you employed then.

@tgwolf

Yet somehow no other companies have figured this out... If only they visited this message board to read these throwaway comments...

@Metallicwolf29

They've been saying that since 198X...

@Gamer_4_Fun @Poodger

Maybe they do, but Nintendo's competitor's certainly do not. That's what you should be thinking about.

You disqualify N's own history because it's not game related, then you bring up examples of other 'giants' that would certainly not be game-related?

Changing the rules as you go.

@thequickshooter

Why are you talking about quality of software? That's not the argument. We're talking about economic performance and market staying power.

Year zero for you is the NES, but year zero was actually 1889. This is what we're talking about - Nintendo's persistence.

This is why Nintendo have been around for more than a century - they understand compromise.

@SIDEFX1

OK then. See you at Woy Woy.

Ubisoft choke when they release on Nintendo. They do it every system launch. There's something wrong with a developer that needs to release only when there is no competition.