smc91352's forum posts

Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
Your question is confusing.

Does Apple overprice their items? Yes.

Does Apple use quality parts? No.the_foreign_guy
if it does what you want it to, its quality enough to me. but the biggest snobs are on PC. the worst, imo, are the ones that go after everything that says ASUS/EVGA/etc. (this does not mean PC has more snobs, btw)

Apple is not affordable (one of the cheaps) and has part with acceptable quality (other cheap).
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
well i was looking at thesedoomspam
phenom ii 955
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
The principal is exatly the same. "they didn't have AK-47s in mind when they wrote the second" or "they didn't have Nazis in mind when they wrote the 1st" are both invalid arguments.herpderp9000
The first amendment's right to speech was meant to protect citizens from government censorship. it does not protect from Yahoo! taking down your comments. the quotes aren't like what I'm saying.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
Not me, I used a possible explanation from another person.herpderp9000
sorry about my misreading. anyway, the ability to claim you're not biased is not something I wanna debate.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
"I'm pretty sure the founding fathers didn't have a mousqe at ground zero in mind when the wrote the 1st."herpderp9000
don't change the subject. I'm not debating that here.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
Sure, they have a right to do it. But they can't claim to be un biased after that.herpderp9000
according to your OP, they took it down because they didn't want their office to get burned down and not because of a bias.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
But, according to you, they can close commenting on a news article about politics, the very essence of what the 1st Ameandment was made for.herpderp9000
I'm pretty sure it was King George they had in mind, not Yahoo!.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
That's the American way. I know the rest of the world might not understand this, and especially GS users, but there is this thing called the First Amendment that gives people the right to make comments, no matter how stupid, insensitive or ignorant they may be.herpderp9000
where in the constitution does it say you have an undeniable right to post comments on Yahoo!'s site?
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
So they don't get to voice their opinon, eh?herpderp9000
they can; Yahoo! just doesn't need to let them do it on their site. and to that comparison: :|
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

88

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
Indonesia doesn't really impose Islam on people, does it? I thought they were really secular. anyway, I think the people's comments has something to do with it.