[QUOTE="rpg9000owner"]

Seriously dude, just give it a break....

Animal-Mother

Aside from the fact that Left 4 Dead 2 could be good - god forbid :o

Seriously dude, just give it a break....

Like last year, E3 flops

lol, lemmings go bonkers over crackdown 2 and now SMG2 is being dissmissed?

SMG = best game of the generation for me, really looking forward to the sequal.

lol, Sims 3 > Spore ... interesting

[QUOTE="o0_L0st_B0y_0o"]

what was said about ghostbusters? thats it's first review is it not?

if thats the average ghostbusters gets (im thinking reviews between 7-8) then it will be a quality game

BioShockOwnz

Eurogamer gave it a 9/10:

http://www.n4g.com/News-331597.aspx

The english Eurogamer probably wouldn't be so willing to hand out a 9

EDIT: lol at your sig :?

PC downloadable games do count; hence why Twilight of the Arnor is counted as an AAAE.Stevo_the_gamer

The main issue is that PC has mods and freeware titles and indie titles and they aren't reviewed. The PC's catalogue of superb indie and free games make a mockery of XBLA, PSN and Wiiware combined, but it wont have recognition and consoles would have an unfair advantage which is disproportionate to the real scenario.

Count XBLA, PSN or Wiiware games and then we have an unfair system. It's that simple. Bragging rights are still there if one console has a better marketplace than another. Lets face it, it's the games at retail that truly make consoles, it just makes sense to compare retail only titles, you know - where it actually counts for the consoles standing.

Doom 3 has aged ok graphics wise, but it's gameplay was dated even when it released, it's probably the worst example to cite in this thread.

eh, Eurogamer's is the best, 5 = average, everywhere else 7 = average .. it actually uses the scale properly.