@Dizzy1976 Actually no. We used to call it "mods". Maybe you haven't been gaming long enough and don't know what "mods" are, only what "DLC" is. Here's a hint: you didn't have to subscribe to it. Ironically enough, we don't want more for less, we want to stop getting less for more.
@traitor_651 You're getting ripped off because you're paying this money for stuff that they used to let amateurs make for free. If they'd let people mod, you'd be getting free DLC at twice the quality.
@Aria1368 "I'm studying economy and I know what I'm talking" lololol. The fact that you're still studying means you don't have any place to be acting superior.
@1234ritchie You're ignorant if you think the pre-owned market has anything to do with this. The pre-owned market has been around for decades. There's no sudden loss of profits because of it; it's just another excuse to get gullible people to agree with them.
Now for the 2nd game they're going to get their idea for the whole, then they're going to take part of it out so that they can sell it separately as DLC.
They make a no-name game that needs 3 million sales just to break even? Whoever gave the go-ahead is the one that needs to be fired. There's no way they should have expected to do that well with a brand new IP.
@landivas This doesn't even make sense. WOW and D3 don't feel similar at all. Oh, well, I guess both games have people that use swords and people that use magic.
rann89's comments