SONY OWNED E3!!!!!

SONY RAPED MICROSOFT BUT WHOLE!

Instead of playing this game everyone knows about forever now, why not give information about Anima?

http://www.gamespot.com/anima-gate-of-memories/

or Kick & Fennick?

http://www.gamespot.com/kick-and-fennick/

But no of course not. That's not your job. Your job is cashing Blizzard's check to over hype retarded games like Overwatch and don't give a sht about anything else.

Don't let me interrupt you on your 100000 H of Mirror Edge stream cause i am sure everyone needs more info about a game that can simply be described as "Same Mirror Edge with more moves and better graphics".

Zero intergrity pricks who dare to call themselves editors and journalists.

I check Gamespot for news about new released PC Games. All you got here is more useless Overwatch Crapp, 100 feed bout Mirror Edge, and even more useless news about The Witcher.

Content about newly release PC games? Well, you have to click PC, then check right, and click "new releases" and see a boring list of new releases with zero information about.

So this website which is suppose to cover Gaming doesn't give a sht about new games unless it's a big AAA company that fills their pockets.

American Comics and their "Parallel Universes"... xD

Don't get me wrong. American Comics and TV shows always start with interesting ideas and bring great "first editions" or "first seasons".

But it's the capitalist mentality of "milking till the end", "invest on what already works" that spoils it all to bring desperate scenarios like "Multiple Universes", "Time Travel", "Galactic Bad guy that will end everything", etc...

Finally it dropped from the Main Banner. But of course Blizzard will keep paying for articles like "Tracer has new shoes! WOW! We reviewed the shoes and we gave it a 9.4! They're awesome!"

And 10 years old fanboys will keep pushing this Disney vs Disney TF2 remake pce of crp around without any success.

Reviewer says 9, 123 ratings says 7.6. Blizzard should also pay fanboys.

@Prats1993: It's too much to pay 60$ for a game i Uninstalled 2 days after the Open Beta started. Yep.

Free? Yeah why not. 1 round every day like HotS. Could have worked. Then I would have said "Yeah the game looks like sht, but it has its fun part and hey! It's free! so why not".

But 60$? lol. No way.

Skins in a FPS game. Sure. You know that's why Overwatch is a paid game right? Cause they can't sell skins in a FPS.

@datriax: Blizz gave lots of $ to Gamespot. Expect lots of Overwatch hype such "HEY TRACER GOT NEW SHOES!" on the front page...

@Cataclysmic0001: The truth is that the hundreds developers you are talking about are:

1. Not skilled.

2. Have wasted years in a project called "Titan" and failed to deliver in time.

3. Trying to hustle players to buy leftovers of the carcass of that Titan project.

4. Are stupid because they released an Open Beta where thousands of players could play and see that the game is terrible.

PS: In my friend list of 30 players, only 2 players have purchased the game. I uninstalled the 2nd day of the free Beta.

As a Free to Play game, it had a chance. But as a paid game? No. They completely missed the point.