mwewerka's comments

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

One for the ladies (and men, if that's your taste), no hate from me. We guys get enough "sexy" lady stuff all year. You beautiful women deserve a little bit of excitement as well.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sellingthings: No you're right, I was just being facetious on the matter. I can't believe Nintendo has the gall to make one game, yet sell it in two different pieces of box art and call them different. WIth the exception of a few pokemon in each (like 3), it's laughable.

That being said, there is an $79 version that does in fact have both games bundled together. It's typical Nintendo screwing over its fans, yet again. You know, like re-releasing their classics on every system they release and forcing your to buy your favorites, over and over and over again, instead of letting you buy it once and just carry it over from device to device.

Screw Nintendo.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sellingthings: Let's be real here, Nintendo really only has 1 game on there, Sun and Moon, two games? Really?

It's the same game, plus or minus a few pokemon from each and different time of day. But it's the same damn game.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@SOul_FUNk: You really thought Battlefield was going to outsell COD? Come on man, you know all the haters saying they wouldn't buy it, were just lying sacks of **** they want to talk big on the internet and sound cool, like they are progressive for not going mainstream with COD and going with BF. Fact is, they lied and COD, while it may have sold less than last year, is still a juggernaut and still crushes all other shooters, period.

That being said, while I love COD and play it every night, Overwatch is my call for Best Shooter of the Year. The game is so damn good, it's further evidence that Blizzard really does polish the hell out of everything they do.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@tomclancyhaha: Shooter of the year, no, it's great, better than Battlefield and Titanfall 2, but not Overwatch. Not by a mile. While COD has a great, solid single player game, its multi-player isn't as fun, smooth or inventive as Blizzard's Overwatch. You watch, it will be game of the year everywhere, it already won at the Video Game awards, it's going to sweep.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mwewerka

I'm really, really liking Infinite Warfare, way more than I did Black Ops 3. At least, right now, they haven't ruined the game like Treyarch with all the stupid costumes, clown outfits and horrible camos and character animations post game (like dabbing and Ney Ney). So far the game has retained it's more militaristic feel and grit. The game play is also very solid and the campaign is really, really good.

But it's also nice to see Titanfall 2 jump up from 11 last month to 5 in November, hopefully that black friday sale helped and with positive word of mouth, the game will live on. Free awesome DLC and solid gameplay, it's a really great game. Battlefield on the other hand is by far the best looking game on any platform, to bad it's a bore to play.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713: Wrong. The app is free and the option to buy is considered an "in-game" purchase, which cannot be shared. If someone wants to share this with their spouse or child, they have to make another account and go through quite a few steps in order to make it happen. But Apple's built in family sharing option is not set up for this game. Look it up, before you claim truth. Nobody thought SEGA would go out of business, nobody thought Chrysler would be owned by the Germans and then the Italians, who would have thought that the pioneers of mobile technology, Motorola, an American legacy, would be bought by Google, then sold to the Chinese and essentially shuttered the company for only its name. You know what, $H!T happens my friend and when it does, it's eye opening. Sony and Microsoft both have strong revenue streams that come from other products to fund their video game/home entertainment divisions. Nintendo doesn't have that and when their install base continues to dwindle, it's only a matter of time. Nobody thought Nintendo would put their flagship characters on a competing platform, but now their on the iPhone, with Animal Crossing and Fire Emblem coming. Nintendo is looking for a life raft, despite what your fanboy heart thinks.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713: You're delusional. The Switch will sell out, like always, because Nintendo creates artificial demand for all their consoles. But the system will die and it will be the last Nintendo console. After this, they'll either be bought by Apple, Sony or they'll go software only.

Mario Run is a joke. It's short, WAY to easy, you practically have to TRY and kill Mario, the price is too high for what you get and families can't share the purchase, which makes no sense. If I buy Zelda for the Wii U, once, my whole family can play it. Why can't I buy Mario run and share it with my wife and son? Not only that, but Apple is shielding Nintendo from written reviews on the app store, only allowing Stars, and those are dropping like flies. The game is bad, and Nintendo's days are numbered.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@edhc44: See, that's all I'm talking about. Just being cool. Hell man, I've been proven wrong all over the place. You just need to take it in stride. Assuming someone just doesn't go full blast on you for no reason (which I did not). I appreciate the apology and hold no grudge.

Take it easy.

Avatar image for mwewerka
mwewerka

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@edhc44: Wow man, I was merely pointing out the errors in the "rumored" theory (which isn't even yours) not attacking you as person. I just pointed out times and dates, like anyone would do with a rumor that can be so easily debunked. You want to call me a "jerk-off" and tell me to "piss off" that's fine, but it just shows how you're more of an immature grunt who can't tolerate being wrong on the internet.

You want me to go off, insult you and make you look like an insulant child, I will, but at this point, I think from your first post, then your follow up, you've already done that yourself. You REALLY got into your head that Ep. 7 was just 6 years after Jedi? Seriously? Jesus man, that is REALLY some, as you say "lapse in judgement." From Slave Leia to a woman who is barely recognizable as Leia, that's some serious freaking aging in just 6 years. How about Luke, a trim, young-faced Jedi, to a late 50's man with a beard full of gray hair and aged face-lines. Yeah, I guess I can see how you could easily mistake that for just 6 years of aging and progression. /s

It's a$$ hats like you that take things so personally on the internet, that make comment sections like this so miserable. Rather than take a correction in stride and acknowledge the errors and have a good "rumor" conversation, you call people names and insult them because YOU were wrong.

Absolutely Pathetic.