The rule is the lower the resolution the more AA is needed. I would say 4x AA is all that you would notice at that resolution. I had a laptop with a 1280x800 15.4" screen and I could notice AA up to 8x. It actually had alot of benefit at that relatively low resolution.

[QUOTE="MarleyBeJammin"]Could you give me an idea of which one would be best? Price is a bit of a consideration and the third one is about $200 cheaper, is it worth going for one of the others?Xeros606

This. I ran WoW on a 1.7 GHz Core Duo with a GeForce 7300 Go 128mb.

It's called The Way Its Ment to be Played.

There are ways to make font bigger and the UI just bigger in general. Try the zoom settings on your web browser and also check in display settings and there are different themes you can use to make things bigger.

On top of that its not how fast the connection is but the lantency that is important.

An APU looks good to me for sure. For non-enthusiast desktops and laptops this looks like the future to me. I would love a laptop with the capability of that APU. However for the time being they cant compete with enthusiast GPU's so for awhile I will be rocking a desktop with a dedicated GPU.

According to this. A 6850 would be a good low power option.

You should be able to run it. DX 11 works on Vista as others have said.

Thread fail. Remove the cancer.

There is gratituious boobs in some sex scenes. You do have the option to skip some parts but other parts are mandatory. Personally I think its amazing.