killaj2786's forum posts

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts

Yep...I'm guessing after MGS4 and FFXIII ( if those devs dont get brought by EA anytime soon) Ima quit gaming. The only ones to to tide me over in to staying are Capcom, Komani, and of course Rockstar.....if they dont get brought by EA....

Damn u EA, then they wonder why we hate them.

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="killaj2786"][QUOTE="Javy03"][QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

on FFXI he did....

On Burnout Revenge:

"

While Burnout Revenge might not have enough new stuff in it to drag you back in if you've been playing it on other platforms, this is definitely the version to get if you're shopping around (aka teh best version). It delivers solid, fast action, both online and off, and is easily the fastest, most exciting racing game available on the Xbox 360."

U did.

The "(aka teh best version)" is your interpretation. Overall the score is in favor of the PS2 version as well as the extra featrues. If you're shopping around is his personal opinion but overall the scores were done differently then and when they weighed the game up to their system it didnt meet the expectations.

Basically the PS2 version was a AAA and the 360 version was an AA.

U said it urself...they're scored differently. Hence the 360 version had higher standards than the ps2 version. Since the score was closer to teh ps2 version, tehy said teh graphics are gameplay were better, beasically tells u if it wasnt fro teh higher standards for the 360, it's teh better version. Seriously if it wasnt why would they say if it's teh version to shop around if u havent played it?

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

on FFXI he did....

On Burnout Revenge:

"

While Burnout Revenge might not have enough new stuff in it to drag you back in if you've been playing it on other platforms, this is definitely the version to get if you're shopping around (aka teh best version). It delivers solid, fast action, both online and off, and is easily the fastest, most exciting racing game available on the Xbox 360."

U did.

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
if i recall burnout revenge almost got an AAA here, and they stated it look almost nextgen ( taht was 4 months into the 360's life) and looks better than teh ps2 version....all others ( except fifa 07 and madden 06) were at launch.....it's been 11 months after the ps3's launch it's it still gettin inferior ports....
Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="killaj2786"]

http://kotaku.com/gaming/smack-talk/the-outsider-is-next-gen-halo-3-and-bioshock-arent-309259.php

He really shouldnt be talking since the game's storyline is already being used over and over again...

G10mgs4

BUT BIOSHOCK, IS BETTER THAN HALO.

HERES THE THING, EVEN DEVS NO THAT HALO IS A WHACK GAME. THEY SEE MS PORMOTING IT LIKE ITS THE END OF THE WORLD., they no there games are better than halo and they no ms bribes reviewers, no think to your self, do you think some one who is getting paid by ms, would be saying things like this........get ready to see bioshock on the ps3 next year, with new features.

bioshock is acclaimed for doing things diffrent, new formula, while halo has relied on the same opne since halo1, shame

Bioshock= new Ip

Halo 3= sequel....can u tell the difference...I'm sick of fanboys saying halo 3 is the same formula. It's a sequel!! It's not supposed to be radically different all of a sudden. i expected the same cuz it's a freaking sequel!!!!

And Ken levine ( who works with TAke 2 boston/austrialia, formerly irrational )already stated thatbioshock wont be ported to teh ps3...stop dreaming.

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts

http://kotaku.com/gaming/smack-talk/the-outsider-is-next-gen-halo-3-and-bioshock-arent-309259.php

He really shouldnt be talking since the game's storyline is already being used over and over again...

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
AA baby.
Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts

They are willing to make a silly dating sim but not a turn-based RPG? GTHO of Japan M$! :evil:Nerkcon

ummm blue dragon, enchanted arms ( yea I know bad example) lost odyessy, cry-on....

Avatar image for killaj2786
killaj2786

2531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 killaj2786
Member since 2006 • 2531 Posts
[QUOTE="killaj2786"]

Wii: 22 outta 86

360: 8 outta47

PS3: 5 outta 38...

Ouch....

madterps

And 75% of them are going to be shovelware. Can you picture 7 out of 10 games end up like NBA Live 2008...

Outta that list...there are alot of good games like Mass Effect, Naruto Ace Combat 6, Uncharted, Haze( hold on.....how does the ps3 have five exclusives unless they counted UT3.....), SMG, and SSBB. If u meant teh Wii by itself I might agree with u tho.