Because she labels the industry sexist without proving it is.

Nah I'm not giving views to that shit. I don't get surprised by feminists going on imaginary rants anymore, I feel like that's a given noawadays but I'm mad people still fall for it because they think they're progressive and liberal when they're only just supporting an idea that in no way has ever been legitimized and actually harms relations between the two gender and encourages even more animosity.

So we shouldn't point out her already misplaced arguments and irrationality and we should just deal with this shit every time a nutjob feminist wakes up with a hard-on to vilify and demonise a whole community?

When someone says "hey I'm gonna discuss low IQ african americans and how these stupid african americans are an issue with our society", they're rightfully dismissed as a racist.

When someone says "hey I'm gonna discuss the extremist Islam and how suicide bombers are representative of muslims", they're rightfully dismissed as generalizing 1.6 billion people as terrorists.

When someone says "look I'm gonna discuss how pedophiles in the vatican are just destroying our society man, these christians just won't let go of these children we have to do something about" you're dismissed as some asshole putting everyone in a basket.

So when someone says "Look this industry is sexist, video games are sexist, people are sexist and sexists are a problem in the video game industry because they're REPRESENTATIVE of all gamers and are surely not just individuals being sexists; oh btw I won't try defining what sexism is yeah **** that" we're supposed to give them some slack? Why?

All the above categories of people have one thing in common. They grasp at straws, generalize, make assumptions and the most important thing: THEY DON'T TRY PROVING THE ASSUMPTIONS SO THE ASSUMPTIONS REMAIN ASSUMPTIONS.

You just can't claim that the industry is sexist and then just source every other argument you make from a false premise and expect people to not criticize when all your conclusion are as wrong as your presumption. This is by definition irrational.

Man I'm fed up explaining this shit every time.

When was the last time a feminist like OP said "hey these people aren't misogynists, they have good points and they attacked my arguments and it seems like my arguments were wrong and hey **** it, I'm not gonna block their comments and cherry pick only the asshole comments for this video I'm gonna make to misrepresent everyone and reinforce my status as a professional victim"?

Answer: Never. And yes I'm being absolute intentionally.

"1# I'll discuss sexism in gaming"

It's not like I was expecting more from a feminist, you know.

Here, let me help you:

Before you discuss sexism in gaming, you have to PROVE that the video game industry is SEXIST as you claim it is, otherwise you're just as illegitimate as Anita and there's absolutely no reason we should stand for even more frauds who take advantage of the victims of instances of sexism in the video game industry to make a quick buck, because saying that you'll make no money from releasing a video on youtube is simply a lie.

Secondly, video games are not sexist because noone has ever proven that video games are sexist. Saying that you'll discuss this non-existent sexism is illegitimate because you have no basis of proof of this sexism.

Thirdly, instead of proving what kind of sexism, where, how, when, why and by whom you've instead used the basis of unverified anecdotal martyrdom and how abused you got from people you don't mention or give details where and when. EXACTLY like Anita.

Furthermore, people from GG have no connection to abusing people. You are again recalling your self-proclaimed victimhood to make whatever claim you want to make.

How your blog shilling isn't automatically classified a big turd by anyone with the least amount of critical thinking is beyond me.

You are ABSOLUTELY like the feminists you claim you are not and I'm not even going to wait for you to classify my post as "threats, sexism, bigotry" or whatever you wish, it's not like any of your other claims are verified in the LEAST.

Stand on the emotional abuse of female victims like the rest of your "colleagues" have done, claim moral highground, assume sexism and martyrdom, label the opposition misogynists and sexists and further divide the community for a quick buck. Good job.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

You are dropping simple links in a debate and you are calling other people fucking stupid?

Please continue, you are very entertaining.

Man, hatred is morally backed by the majority of people who play video games and are not retarded enough to think, as you said, that pixels (and any other depiction of art) cause harm in society.

You shouldn't give a shit about what the rest think, they're not gonna change heart as you're seeing in this thread.

Wait I'm taking it back, you didn't use "violence" as in "depiction", you actually used it as fucking violence and OP is calling you out for it and tells you you're being a hypocrite on post #19 where he's telling you actual people acting violent is different than violence in video games and at the next post I interjected which is where you started ignoring OP.

hahahahah you're a little sneaky coward as I said, you almost fucking fooled me. Very nice backpeddling tho

Yeah, I'm out, there's no point in continuing this shit.