@toast_burner said:
@kakamoura said:
@toast_burner said:
You assumed she said something she didn't based on nothing more than the fact that she's a woman, that's sexist.
Not sure how you are going to try and twist this to make me seem sexist but I'm curious what you can come up with.
You assumed I even gave a shit she has a vagina when I didn't even fucking mention her gender and tackled every single one of her points one by one in my previous posts.
You are a sexist because you think if I'm against illegitimate liars, I'm against women, therefore you think women are all illegitimate liars and support feminism.
You've given a pretty good in the glimpse in feminist logic on what is sexist or not. I already mentioned that she will call anyone who disagrees with her a sexist and a misogynist and you are doing it right now.
That shit won't fly anymore, you've done that without people calling you out for years. Now people can spot feminist fallacies and ways in which they manipulate and frame the opposition.
But keep trying, it's entertaining. (also yeah, stay away from the fact that she won't use any kind of fact checking or scientific research to back any of her claims up which constitutes this whole ordeal just a glorified shit opinion that has been debunked one thousand fucking times.)
Except you haven't tackled her points, you just assumed she said something and tackled those delusions instead. If it's not sexism that drove you to make such baseless claims what was it?
Logic and experience with modern feminists.
When I see "I'll discuss sexism in X" I know it doesn't mean "I'll hit it on with a bunch of scientists and will look into creating a scientific thesis on the issue from an unbiased perspective".
What I see is "I'll not even try defining what sexism is, we'll just label anything we want sexist and we'll back it up with a circular logic of confirmation bias and pseudo-intellectualism and feminist buzzwords while also playing the victim and appealing to emotion".
The fact that she introduced herself as a "ruthless anita", the person who hasn't even made the LEAST effort to debate with people she disagrees with her just reinforce my points.
Now, understand that I WANT to be proven wrong, I'd like very much to see her actually defining what sexism is and what it is not and engage in cases of sexual abuse and emotional abuse that females can face in this space but there's absolutely no indication she'll do that.
She'll just gonna make as you did and be a typical irrational feminist that throws labels around like they're worth shit when they're so overused.
I'm not giving the least benefit of doubt this time, no.
Log in to comment