@sladakrobot: xbox fanboys change their argue from "resolution doesn't matter" to "xbox has the true 4k that's why it is the best"; while sony fanboys change their argue from "ps4 has the best resolution that's why it is the best" to "resolution doesn't matter at all". Normal people doesn't change their mind to defend a thing.
@coldsilfur4: You have a point on first year line up. The Nintendo's problem in POV is it first year moment. Nintendo is not up against first year ps4 or xone. Its rivals is 3.5 years old, bringing titles as 2 battlefields, 2 assassins creed, 2 injustice, need for speed, call of duty, gta V, middle earth, tomb raider, far cry, metal gear, destiny, the witcher 3, dark souls 3, Batman, mortal kombat and the upcoming games are up ahead. I think nintendo's mistake was about time and relationship with thirties. I don't know what to think about the future of switch, but if it have just AAAs from last gen could give it a better performance, what it has had so far.
@halo1399: What about Assassins creed, watch dogs 2, the witcher, shadow of mordor, injustice, mortal kombat, battlefield, CoD, Ghost recon, GTA V, tomb raider, Rocket League, far cry, resident evil, metal gear, dark souls 3, fallout...? Skyrim is almost 6 years old, Fifa and NBA are ok, rayman legends is 4 years old, but is good and mario kart 8 is the only game in that I wish, but it is wii u game too with some extras.
@alucard1001: Sorry, but I didn't say anything about sellings. I just said IMO exclusives weigh a lot for most I know and for what I have seen. It seems reasons to buy a console not always is made good use of.
Jone_G2's comments