[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

give me a min...

waltefmoney

Sure.

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Genre doesn't matter

waltefmoney

Sorry, but that doesn't even come close to this:

LMAO...that's a PC screen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

See what I mean? this is what I'm talking about when Riddick is actually an ULGY game on xbox, I OWNED IT. Don't make me go get real screnes, please don't try to use PC screens for xbox to make it look better there are actaully a couple of game on xbox that truely surpass everything the PS2 put out, but this is not one of them.

Using DOA3/U or Splinter Cell CT would be a safe better CT is the best looking xbox game period and don't think the PS2 could ever do it but don't lie about the games it makes you look desperate.

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

[QUOTE="tastetheacidmil"]the xbox last gen killed the ps2 in graphics peroid, this gen the ps3 has the better lookin games exclusive wise, to me 360 does multiplats betterwaltefmoney

lol, the xbox killed PS2 in graphics? no not even close. I've almost every notable xbox game created but when compaired to PS2's best there are only a handfull that out strip everything the PS2 could do just like this gen. The graphical prowess of the orignal xbox is largely exagerated by lemmings who tried to downplay everything about the PS2.

There are some absolutely stunning PS2 games that look better than 95% of everything that's out on xbox, but there are a handfull that look better than PS2's best but with those hand full I have no problem regarding xbox in superior graphics hardware. Since I still own the games and have made comparisons.

Show me a better looking PS2 game than Doom 3, Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay or Half Life 2.

give me a min...

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

The gap is much bigger this gen than last gen.

And it's a very simple reason that most people have totally ignored when compairing the xbox vs PS2 diffrence to the PS3 vs xbox360 diffrence.

Silverbond

Don't just leave us hangin, bro. What's the very simple reason?

:) the law of deminishing returns.

It would take a lot more to actually SEE the diffrence in graphics this gen then it would last gen because of the genearal jump in power is so much greater for all systems. For the PS3 to actually establish a general opinion of graphical superiority this gen it has to be doing alot more the xbox would have had to do last gen to acheive the same result.

the xbox last gen killed the ps2 in graphics peroid, this gen the ps3 has the better lookin games exclusive wise, to me 360 does multiplats bettertastetheacidmil

lol, the xbox killed PS2 in graphics? no not even close. I've almost every notable xbox game created but when compaired to PS2's best there are only a handfull that out strip everything the PS2 could do just like this gen. The graphical prowess of the orignal xbox is largely exagerated by lemmings who tried to downplay everything about the PS2.

There are some absolutely stunning PS2 games that look better than 95% of everything that's out on xbox, but there are a handfull that look better than PS2's best but with those hand full I have no problem regarding xbox in superior graphics hardware. Since I still own the games and have made comparisons.

EDIT:

and those 360 multiplats don't look better than PS3's best so I don't konw the point of that comment.

The gap is much bigger this gen than last gen.

And it's a very simple reason that most people have totally ignored when compairing the xbox vs PS2 diffrence to the PS3 vs xbox360 diffrence.

Even if it did, I still think folks would still deny it. At this point, I don't think it should even matter though.Stevo_the_gamer

which "folks"?

PS3 fans or people in the gaming industry who have all said KZ2+UC2+GOW3>>> anything graphically on consoles (that includes everything on xbox360)?

It's one thing to argue with PS3 fans, it's another thing to pull the "opinion" card and disregard everything the majority of the gaming journalists and websites and analyists have been saying since mid 2008 till now.

It's fun to say you (insert random xbox360 game) is = to Uncahrted 2,KZ2,GOW3 but you will never hear a game developer ever mention any of those random xbox games then they talk about the best graphics or graphics tech on consoles.

Other game develpers compaire their upcomming games to these PS3 exclusives, when was the last time an unrealted developer compaired their upcomming game to a xbox360 game for graphics claiming they were the benchmark or best on consoles???????????????????

Even MS admits it, lemmings are the only ones in denial.

"The guys at Crytek just don't give up with their fighting talk! Apparently, one of the writers behind Crysis 2 has claimed that what he has seen of Crysis 2 in its ALPHA stages SURPASSES Killzone 2. Boy, this sequel better be good or else Crytek will be left with a very red face"

http://www.maxconsole.net/content.php?39598-Crytek-Crysis-2-at-alpha-stages-surpasses-Killzone-2

"Upcoming FPS Battlefield Bad Company 2 is "reaching" the graphical quality set by last year's stunning PS3-exclusive Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, but it will not surpass it, developer DICE had admitted.

Speaking to VideoGamer.com, producer Gordon Van Dyke said no game can claim to better the graphics seen in Naughty Dog's Uncharted 2.

"I wouldn't make that kind of claim," he said. "Uncharted 2 is an amazing-looking game"

http://www.videogamer.com/news/dice_bad_company_2_reaching_uncharted_2s_graphics.html

GOD of War III: The best graphics we've ever seen.

It's not only a massive relief then, but a revelation, that God Of War 3, previously high on our bullshot radar has just not only met, but exceeded any possible graphical expectations we previously held. The up-close detail is almost painfully sharp with the game's engine panning back without a blip to epic-scale carnage. Quite simply breathtaking. In a purely visual context, God Of War 3 has just earned a comfortable place in our number one spot.

http://ps3.nowgamer.com/news/2548/god-of-war-3-the-best-graphics-weve-ever-seen

Microsoft promised better looking games than PS3

· "We congratulate Sony and Guerilla Games for their efforts with Killzone 2, however this is only the beginning of a new wave. The current technology employed for certain unannounced Xbox 360 exclusives far surpasses what gamers have seen in any game so far. Gears of War was the beginning of this technological benchmark when released on the 360 and this lineage will be carried forward in the following months with exclusives that shall stand for a new definition of gaming experience and provide stiff competition for the opposition."

http://www.gamercenteronline.net/2009/03/03/microsoft-future-xbox-360-exclusives-will-surpass-killzone-2/

Don't forget GT5 is upcomming this year, next year it's Killzone 3, and Infamous 2... the list goes on. GT5 already claimed best graphics award from gamescon, but it's just "the cows" isn't it stevo?

[QUOTE="Zophar87"]

[QUOTE="yugioh3ds"]

360 has tons of exclisives, let me name them all.......

1. Gears of War

2. Halo

3. Nothing

yugioh3ds

You have no idea what you're talking about.

I know exactly what I'm talking about

No, you forgot Forza.

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

but, "I can afford 60 dollars a year" is a perfectly fine thing to say. Honestly, people are putting to much into Principle and all that. 60 dollars isnt a big deal for what your getting, arguably the best onlien experince theyre is.

edo-tensei

& I can't afford $60 a year for an online experience isn't? People will say "get a new hobby" but the person might have a budget that is already pre-set you know.Not saying XBlive is not worth it, it certainly is if you believe it is because your the one paying for it but some people might not feel or think the same way you know.

I have all except the wii and I don't pay for live, I'd feel really stupid if I did when there is nothing of value that I gain form giving my money other than being able to play games online. Other systems do that for free.