hard_body79's forum posts

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="Wartzay"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Well that's your right but they'll never be free.FlamesOfGrey

https://steamcommunity.com/

http://www.xfire.com/

This thread is about console did you read the OP?

"TOO YOU"

Did you read the OP? He was giving his opinion you had no right to interject what YOU feel about how he thinks. If you want to keep going on about "reading the OP" then atleast follow those rules....but you didn't so you can't even complain.

BTW:

Cross game chat isn't worth anything. It has absoultly nothing to do with the game I'm playing. It's the same as asking how much PS Home is worth. regardless of how much I think it's worth it dosen't really have anything to do with when I'm actually playing games online. it's just a social feature just like cross game chat.

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

now someone needs to show Gears of War 2 next to Uncharted 2 or something like that and then we can all say more color=better graphics.

dovberg

sorry it's alot more than that...and gears 2 dosen't even look better than KZ2 (unanimous console gfx king upon release):lol: so how in the world did Gears2 suddenly just to Uncharted 2 level graphics? I don't understand why people are arguing this, there is nothing to back up their opinion other that other fanboys.

Gears 2 obviouslyisn't acompairison to UC2 because KZ2 beat all games in out in 2009 for best gfx on consolesand UC2 beat that out.

Image 10Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshoteven multiplayer is above anytihng xbox360 on xbox.Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Screenshot

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

No, the difference last generation was quite large. The difference this generation between the PS3 and Xbox 360 is negligible.Stevo_the_gamer

:lol: then why dose everyone in the industry say PS3 has better graphics...EVEN M$? I'm sorry but I proved this to you the other day and you never responeded back. You don't have anything to support you opinion of this except the fact that you say that you favor xbox360 and MS.

The diffrence obviously ISN'T negligible because if it was people in the industry wouldn't be saying PS3 have the best gfx. Fanboy opinons on System wars mean next to nothing, that goes for the whole fourm.

the reason why Gears 1 was conceeded to be the best looking game at the time is because reviewers, journalists and other developers came out and statedthat it was the benchmark, after Uncharted 1 was releasedthose comments werer never made for any other xbox360 game ever again.

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]

Here ya go buddy. Riddick on Xbox 1, and looks better than anything on PS2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3ziqA7WbTk

delta3074

LMAO, in your opinion but I stongly disagree. and I thought lemmings hated small corridor games? The game is so dark you can't see half of what's going on and the character models are so low poly it's pathetic.

Like I said I own/ed the game so I don't know what the video is supposed to prove. I was not inpressed to the least when I played it, in fact the horrible gfx and animations turned me off to the game. You seem to want me to agree that xbox killed PS2 in gfx and that's simply fanboy talk. PS2 has amazing graphics when coupled with animations physics and effects. to be honest the only thing really impressive with the orginal xbox was it's use of textures which PS2 admittedly sucked at.

this is much more impressive imo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL8TUsKdde8&feature=related

also:

Riddick PC

Riddick

Riddick xbox

Image 9

i already stated, the first picture is not PC it's from the remake of chronicles of riddick from assault on dark athena, not the PC version of the original game, so your comparison fails really, also, chronicles of riddick was considered the best looking game of last gen, second to ddom 3, and if you think the differences are bigger this gen then you really are a blind fanboy, UC2 is hardly 'much better' looking than gears 2 on the 360,lol

*sigh*

Ok PROVE IT!

So I'm a blind fanboy, what's with all the flamming and personal attacks?

anyways the bold, can you prove your statement? Give me something that isfrom a professional in the industry not affiliated with MS, not something from youor someonewho is asystem wars fanboy.

Also I feel overwehlmingly that Splinter Cell CT was the best looking console game last gen and it wasn't even the BEST looking game last gen because HL2 was there or did you forget PC existed all of a sudden because the arguement isn't about PS3 and xbox360?

Top 10 best graphics on xbox.

http://xbox.about.com/od/toppicks/tp/xboxgraphics10.htm

not my opinin from people in the industry. I think SC:CT should be No.1 but look where Riddick is at :o

Bad company 2 reaching the quality of uncharted 2

Upcoming FPS Battlefield Bad Company 2 is "reaching" the graphical quality set by last year's stunning PS3-exclusive Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, but it will not surpass it, developer DICE had admitted.

Speaking to VideoGamer.com, producer Gordon Van Dyke said no game can claim to better the graphics seen in Naughty Dog's Uncharted 2.

"I wouldn't make that kind of claim," he said. "Uncharted 2 is an amazing-looking game. But we're reaching that level of quality. It's going to be hard for any game to be able to make a claim that they look better.

http://www.videogamer.com/news/dice_bad_company_2_reaching_uncharted_2s_graphics.html

lol, that destroys you claim about "UC2 is hardly much better looking than Gears 2, most 2010 can't even match it (GOW3 only another PS3 exclusive) and your trying to use a 2008 game? LMAO KZ2 handily beat that and UC2 1up'ed it.

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

Wow some cows believe PS2 looked better than Xbox. What the. I don't even understand this. I'm pretty sure these folks are convinced PS2 is better than 360 in graphics as well.

crusadernm

wow and I don't remember ANYONE saying that, maybe you're in the wrong thread or just seeing things.

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

You seem to want me to agree that xbox killed PS2 in gfx and that's simply fanboy talk. PS2 has amazing graphics when coupled with animations physics and effects. to be honest the only thing really impressive with the orginal xbox was it's use of textures which PS2 admittedly sucked at.

waltefmoney

Xbox

CPU Custom 733 MHz Intel Pentium III "Coppermine-based" processor

PS2

CPU 64-bit "Emotion Engine" clocked at 294.912 MHz (launch), 299 MHz (newer models)

Seriously..


Point?

I already said xbox's best beat out PS2's best. but the talk about xbox killling PS2 in graphics is fanboy talk as proven by the graphically impressive games PS2 put out next to xbox.

PS2 a was able to handle compelx geometry and physics with amazing animations (if you even ever played a PS2 you could acknoledge that) xbox didn't do nearly as well in those departments but it has better AA and could use textures to make the game all shiny. Almost any game on xbox that didn't rely on textuers to cover the low poly models used in it's games failed compaired to PS2 counterparts.

look at ninja gaiden it's all nice and clean and shiny...but NOTHING is going on. it's unimpressive to me compaired to PS2 games like MGS with uses lighing physics, animations and effects to create a much more impressive visual experience. Look at shadow of the collosis there is nothing on the xbox with scale of that magniture with graphics like that. You can try to make what ever argument you want but saying xbox destroyed PS2 in graphics just isn't true.

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

...

delta3074

Neither of those games looks to be Doom 3/Chronicles of Riddick/Half Life 2 quality. And those aren't the only amazing looking Xbox games:
Ninja Gaiden Black

that one pic destroys every one hard body posted,like i keep saying the xbox was the first HD console,lol

Ummm, no

Image 78

Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

Sorry, but that doesn't even come close to this:

Riddick

RawDeal_basic

There is nothing to "trust" they are PC screnes. I own the game so I don't know who you're trying to sell that to.

this is the xbox version

this is the PC version

the xbox version looks NOTHING like the PC version. Gamespot has been know to mix xbox and PC screens together when putting screnes of the same game up but the diffrence is unmistakable. this is a PC screen you have and it's obvious to anyone who's actually played the game. the quality ofthe xbox version is well below the bestgraphics the PS2has put out.

Here ya go buddy. Riddick on Xbox 1, and looks better than anything on PS2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3ziqA7WbTk

LMAO, in your opinion but I stongly disagree. and I thought lemmings hated small corridor games? The game is so dark you can't see half of what's going on and the character models are so low poly it's pathetic.

Like I said I own/ed the game so I don't know what the video is supposed to prove. I was not inpressed to the least when I played it, in fact the horrible gfx and animations turned me off to the game. You seem to want me to agree that xbox killed PS2 in gfx and that's simply fanboy talk. PS2 has amazing graphics when coupled with animations physics and effects. to be honest the only thing really impressive with the orginal xbox was it's use of textures which PS2 admittedly sucked at.

this is much more impressive imo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL8TUsKdde8&feature=related

also:

Riddick PC

Riddick

Riddick xbox

Image 9
Avatar image for hard_body79
hard_body79

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 hard_body79
Member since 2010 • 422 Posts

[QUOTE="hard_body79"]

...

waltefmoney

Neither of those games looks to be Doom 3/Chronicles of Riddick/Half Life 2 quality. And those aren't the only amazing looking Xbox games:
Ninja Gaiden Black

You asked me to show you I did. I didn't say every game, as you seem to have overlooked the fact that I said overall xbox beat out the best graphics PS2 could produce. but fanboys saying xbox gfx killed PS2's is a joke because of certian said games that I posted.

the main places where xbox beat PS2 is textures and AA

but PS2 beat xbox in physics and animation and effects.

You are arguing with someone who has played BOTH of the systems best games so there is no need to try to BS me with which games look better. The only xbox game to ever make be go OMG were DOA 3/U and Splinter Cell CT....but at teh same time PS2 was able to make be do that with several games as well (MGS2/3, Jak, GT3)

Did Splinter Cell CT look better tha all those games? Yeah but other xbox games don't really come close either. The diffrence people talking about between the two systems isn't really that big.