From what I've seen of her, she's not someone worthy of promoting. She is rude and condescending, ignores any legitimate criticism of herself, and the particular feminist views she holds aren't representative of main stream feminism - she has some rather firm views that are prudish and hostile, eg she seems very sex negative. Most feminists I've seen seem a lot more relaxed than her about woman in games being attractive.Not to mention her using other peoples' footage in videos without permission or credit, and her misrepresenting the games she shows. Her career is being a feminist critic and she profits from attention, she has every incentive to represent individual games as being sexist even if they aren't. And the worst part is that she hasn't become big and influential just because loads of normal people like her work, she receives lots of promotion from games sites like this, perhaps people who assume in good faith that her being a feminist means she is worth listening to without scrutinising her actual work. Most people aren't interested in her, she is some forced celebrity.She is a poor example to those interested in feminism, a poor role model for women, a dishonest critic and not someone who deserves promotion. She is a reactionary who thrives on generating controversy, and profits from making things out to be sexist no matter if they actually are. And because games sites have elevated her status, her judgments have influence and games developers feel compelled to listen to her. I'm sure she does say some sensible and meaningful stuff, but that's incredibly easy to do. Anyone can read some feminist discourse, learn the language and ideas and slap out some content.Still, to those of you wondering why GS is writing about her, look at the amount of traffic this article has generated. Controversial posts are always the ones with the most comments!