I have not seen the evidence that Jesus Christ certainly existed.
I believe the Jesus myth is based upon many similar relgious stories from earlier belief systems.
Historians make inferences based on evidence found, so history changes often, as new evidence get discovered and inferences ande interpretations made from them.
I know there were many people called Jesus living in Israel during those times, based on historical evidence from the time. Jesus was quite a common name then.
You might like to learn to make things - anything from cars, furniture, electronics, or other engineering can be made by idle hands and the sense of achievement gained can not be purchased.
Take up painting or sculpture. Manage a band. Music recording and video editing are all possible - even within limited budgets nowadays, so songs and films can be created by anyone.
This advice comes from someone retired for a few years now!
I'd say it's true - but the Daily Mail do distort things rather. For instance, the bit about bb guns being converted to fire real bullets is not strictly true. I think they are wrong about the election angle too:
Sounds like this poor chap would have been racially assulted by the skinhead whether he was wearing an Obama T-shirt, a McCain t-shirt or a McDonalds t-shirt. I don't sense any hysteria about the US elections here in the UK at all. The unusual thing I noted from that report was that anyone here would be interested enough in the US elections to wear a t-shirt over it!
Deity is a whole nother issue. I am just saying that it is reasonable to believe that a jewish dude named Jesus was alive and executed by the roman government. documentation and history supports it. I myself am agnostic.
superheromonkey
Reasonable to believe, based on what evidence?
How can history support it when historians dispute it?
Log in to comment