@ctcvet: Because they posted about Sony news? I'm actually quite interested in this if it's for PC.

Quit hating, it's embarrassing for yourself. Seriously.

@peekaboobs: My launch controller only gave me about 4 or 5 hours, and later only about 3. However, I later picked up the anniversary edition after my original fell apart and I get better. Maybe 6 hours on a good day? But certainly no 25 hours. That's just a load of HS.

The XB1 controller I use on my PC though...man that battery life is excellent. Too bad everything else is meh...

@kyelo: Comparing two consoles that don't exist when we don't even have official specs or pricing on one of them? Come on now.

You're probably right, but if the XB2 or whatever is as powerful as they say, it could have an edge on the NEO. 2 teraflops is a lot of beef.

@Ravenlore_basic: I can handle a typo every once in a while, but your comment was written so poorly I honestly had a horrid time just trying to figure out what you're trying to say, that this is the only response that I can come up with.

@ps3gamer1234: That's not true at all. All of those titles show significant reductions in both geometry and shadow detail.

I think you need to revisit these games and pay closer attention.

@sladakrobot: I've been thinking this for years. Speed was a nice gimmick when it was new, but now it's just in the way.

@RossRichard: It is 2016 after all.

@Gravity_Slave: Someone has to step up and make real games.

@Pyrosa: I feel required to mention the highly overlooked Shantae: Pirates Curse.

Fabulous game (actually the third in the series).

@Ice-Cube: Neo is around 4 teraflops while the scorpio is 6. XB1 S is around the PS4, which is around 1.8 or 1.9.