@AndreGreen3000: 4k Upscale, NOT native 4k. Every 4k display can already upscale it for you, the system doesn't even need to do it. You will NOT be gaming on a game being 'rendered' in 4K. They will add more pixels to the same native 1080p (or lower) image... which does? You guessed it, nothing noticeable.

The 4k support coming to consoles is for VIDEO FILES. (which PC has been able to do for 15 years, but there were no 4k files to play)

@soul_starter: Get your eyes checked out buddy cos you're in trouble. Console versions don't even look like HD. Far too blurry.

@akassassin11: You're an idiot mate. No pc gamer wonders if it will run. EVERYTHING runs. PC games have settings.

@pooya_d: A person that doesn't know they can play their PC on the couch on the big TV with surround sound doesn't deserve to have the best image quality. Seriously, you paid loads for a console when all you needed was another HDMI cable and a controller.

@soul_starter: You are absolutely crazy or are viewing it on a terrible device or something because the PC footage stands out by leaps and bounds. I'm not even going to bother explaining why you are so wrong, I shouldn't have to. You either don't have the means or the eyesight to see the difference.

Also, if you have V-Sync enabled on PC for these tests then you need to be fired. Locking it at 60fps is retarded and isn't a proper comparison, is it?

They need to mention the full PC specs.. seriously. Only stating the GPU model means nothing on it's own. CPU, GPU, RAM and HDD/SSD please. Not just the basics either. I want to see the actual brand and model of the GPU, the model, capacity and the speed of the RAM and the model and speed of the HDD.

Not knowing the whole PC environment properly doesn't help PC gamers decide which platform to buy it on.

A frames per second counter on PC without V-Sync enabled would be useful as well.. so we know if the hardware you used was overkill.

@doraemon1987: Good argument. I respect your brain.

This honestly gets 1/10 from me. Nothing can change the fact I played two matches, was highest ranked player in the second match and didn't know what else the game had for me to do after that.

The only reason to keep playing is for the sake of playing. It's great if that's enough to motivate someone but it's not for me, at all. I need depth, progression and motivation. There's far too many good games out there, old or new, that deserve to be played for someone to be stuck repeating battlegrounds over and over again for no reason.

If someone enjoys it, though, I respect that. We're just different types of gamers.

@Mogan: I think re-releasing games that aren't even that old is about as boring as this industry can get.