At least the PS4 can run the game. Based on what I've seen on the Xbone, the Xbone would explode trying to play TLOU: Remastered in 720p.

LOL... And you think Halo 5 is going to sell as well as its predecessors? I'd like to smell the farts you're smelling. Not even sniffing cow farts will make you this delusional.

Halo is done. Halo 5 will sell 5 million LTD.

Even better. The PlayStation family has Naughty Dog.

MS only has a bunch of B-tier and C-tier studios that will never make a game as critically acclaimed as Naughty Dog games. They'll sell a few million, but only because lems need to prove to cows that they too have 'good games'. LOL

There's a difference between being immature and being child-friendly.

I rate immaturity by the (lack of) sophistication in games. Naught Dog games are well-written and philosophical. MS games just don't have that.

MCC, because the game will look like a last-gen game.

Halo 5, because 343i is a B-tier studio. I expect low sales and low MC score.

Youtube videos won't do it justice. People have been saying it's the best looking console game they've played.

Also, it's a guarantee that TLOU: R looks better and will look better than any Xbone game. Xbone already hit its cap. PS4 has yet to reach its full potential.

I predict MS making outrageous sales predictions - 15 million LTD.

Reality hits them in the ass. MCC and Halo 5 only sell 2-3 million each. Microsoft rages and cries in their office. Lems finally admit to themselves that they only bought Halo because they had nothing else to buy. The series is trash and has less sophistication than teletubbies.

And Lems keep saying that one of the games is going to be remade. Sure, but the game looks like a piece of crap. Look at the gamersyde video of Halo 2. It looks like SHIT. Even Uncharted 1 looks better.

That's because the only way to achieve backwards compatibility is to:

A) Hardware support, which will only raise the BoM for a feature that hardly anyone will use. You want to pay $599 for a PS4? Most people don't. You really think more than 1% of PS4 owners will turn on their PS3s ever again?

B) Software emulation, which is incredibly taxing on the hardware. You need hardware that is multiple times stronger than the hardware its trying to emulate in order to run the games smoothly. PS2 was approximately 50x stronger than the PS1, so it was easy to emulate PS1 games. The PS4 is only 10-12x stronger than the PS3. The Xbone is only 1.5x (Yes, 1.5x, not 15x. Its weakass architecture prevents devs from utilizing even 20% of its theoretical power) stronger than the 360. Even if the PS4 were 50x stronger than the PS3, I doubt SONY would ever try to implement PS3 software emulation. The PS3's architecture is just way too complicated. It would take years even with an army of John Carmacks and Mark Cernys.

RYSE could be run on the PS3 at 720p.

Don't get why lems have such a hard on for this game. It's just an extremely linear game with 1 or 2 enemies popping up after every 15 seconds of walking. The environments are static. Plus it's only 900p. The game's not really a technical marvel. You're free to say that it has a better art style than all PS4 games, but that has about as much worth as saying Mario 64 looks better than all Xbone games because of its amazing art work.