@NTM23 @bennehftw I loved the concept of 1, brotherhood was probably the closest game to hitting the mark of the feeling of how innovative 1 was. I can't play the same game in a different environment with a few added tidbits. Might as well be a separate DLC. The story of AC is amazing, the huge depth of the game wants me going for more, but I'm not going to play the same game over and over just to see the story.
Honestly by your review is sounds like a version of the Windwaker, but with duller sea travel. Is the ship part of the game that integral?
Near the end of Mass Effect 1, I just wanted the game to end, I completely rushed through the last few sequences because I grew bored of the game. Never played 2 or 3 because of that.
@nico2000nl @bennehftw Meh, not a CoD fan to start with. If it gives you any sort of idea of what kind of gamer I am, I loved Fallout 3, and Skyrim, but hated New Vegas, and not a fan oblivion (played in reverse order). Similarities in games don't make them better, it's the same game just with a different face, subtle differences (which subtlety can be debated, but in my opinion) I seem to be getting a lot of comments being more provoking than anything, and not adding to my question at all. Which was an honest question, as I do want to like AC 1.
@Lunar6 @bennehftw I want to love the series really, it was the story that drew me to wanting so much more. The introduction of guns was the main thing that threw me off. I mean all those little side stories, I ate it all. It was the repetitive structure of it all that started to get stale, but as long as the exploration aspect of it is better maybe I would like it. I always loved the exploration aspect of it.
@jawslover @jawslover This was prior to GTA 5 launching as well. It was clearly just a premeditated attempt to push GTA even more out there. We all know if GTA won, it would've been posted up there for weeks.
It's just one of those things where they say one thing, and then if you read the fine print they really mean something else. I mean seriously how do they go public with that statement, then they change the TOS to say something completely different. Because some people will just take as truthful media, that is basically verbal garbage, and the other no one will actually bother to read, but is actually a legally binding document.
bennehftw's comments