@corteztheg Wow, you're pretty dull minded aren't you? You think this is about making their games better? You think this will actually result in making their games better? Grow up. I hope they lose. Maybe THAT will put some sense into their heads and they'll make some better games.
@bloody-hell Shut up. Just shut up. And yes, there are gamers who do give a damn. If the military uses it, I'd rather see the real name than some bullcrap sellout name.
Once again, screw EA. Doesn't understand trademarks all the while trying to bend over backwards for liberal politicians. No one needs you to play the political game, EA, there's nothing in that for you. Just be a damn game publisher and stop trying more gimmicks to get off the worst-in-America company list.
Screw you Ubisoft. Glad I'm done with your games. Unless there truly is more to the story (something that Patrice did), then this sounds like the way Activision treated West and Zampella.
Wait, I don't really get it. He's a Christian, and has a problem with the character being baptized in-game? I mean, I'm a Christian too. Is it about the baptism being forced or about the fact that the character is baptized? Really confused here (not a Bioshock fan, so the whole Valve refund topic brought me here)
They never learn do they? After their PC community, and yes, THEIR PC Community, hated and rejected their always-on scheme, they'd then think that the console community would be open to it? Maybe, if console players are really that dull-minded. But, well, I doubt that. At least, there are some smart console gamers. I just would have thought that Ubisoft would have learned better. Should have known better. I mean, after all they failed their PC community, the community that made them big. So, I guess it's not a surprise that they'd ultimately fail their console community too. And, yeah, this is from a PC player who stopped playing Ubisoft games after the disgraces that were GRFS and ACIII.
antoineflemming's comments