@strangelove_1 Stupid comment of the day goes to this.

@foodrules They should do a live 1v1 next week

@dannydopamine8 Wait, wut, 5 is for unplayable broken games? What would the 4, 3, 2, and 1 be for then?

@fredyellowone Stop focusing so much on a damn number.

@ScottOakley I'd argue it's an even better review than most of the positive ones, considering it actually made me more interested in the game than how I felt after reading other reviews.

All reviews are a mix presenting facts and then coloring them with opinion, it's how you present those opinions that make a review professional or not.

@fredyellowone @Zjarcal

You can only be objective about facts, most of the facts about this game are acknowledged in this review, they are simply colored by a negative view about them.

Reviews are a mix of objectiveness and subjectiveness. You can state all the facts about a game but ultimately they are going to be colored by your own personal views.

That's not "wrong", that's just how reviews should be.

@fredyellowone When did he even say the game was broken? Pretty sure he's aware it's intended to work this way, he just didn't like it and shared his view. You can't be "wrong" about your own view.

@spartanx169x @daikkenaurora12 You shouldn't really value either over the other, just read whatever different stuff they say and take the most useful parts for whatever purchase decision you make. Well that's assuming you haven't bought this or are interested in it to begin with.

I like the other take reviews more though when the alternate review varies wildly from the official one, it's fun to read the completely different appreciations (or lackthereof) of a game.

@camachine Yeah, that does make sense, thanks for the reply. :)

@CapmJim Yeah, that part of the review did throw me off a bit, this one was on par with all the other headhunter packs as far as content goes.