Wolfie600's comments

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

mrzisawesome: Generic? If it was a Call of duty spin off in a modern setting that would be "Generic". There's not alot of Sci-fi shooters that are worth playing in the market currently. And Halo:Reach has to be one of the better when it comes to shooters in all 3 consoles. Theres just so much to do that all the other shooters fall behind on content and anyone that disagrees is probably a fanboy or just a plain hater.

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

@ PS3gamer890 you obviously didnt read that the Xbox 360 had crispier and better textures in a minuscule amount.. Dont be a fanboy they are both basically the same.

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

No difference at all. If much the PS3 one is more blurry and brighter.

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

Thank you to the game studios that can still make awesome and entertaining games: IW,US,Valve.

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

My schedule is wake up invite a bunch of friends over and play halo 3 local matches (4vs4) then when the game starts eat alot of junk food chips,pizza,chicken you name it :P fun times...

Avatar image for Wolfie600
Wolfie600

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Wolfie600

you have to see the game in person to taste the graphics you **** this is not too critizize it so f**** off halo 3 has awesome graphics and Gears of war is just gray landscape so yea... halo has more vivid colors and lighting is awesome