@Berserk8989: Just because someone calls a movie boring, doesn't mean they expect constant action and explosions every five second.

Furthermore, action movies can be painfully boring as well.

@Berserk8989: Mentioning Blade Runner 2049 is odd, seeing as how it was another boring movie unworthy of making bucketloads of money.

@atherworld: You're both missing the point of adjusting movie prices for inflation, it gives a sense for how many people actually went to see a movie.

If movie A made $10 mil spand cost $1 to see and movie B made $50 and cost $10, movie A was actually more successful.

Furthermore, inflation doesn't just affect prices, but what people earn. So no, back when Gone With the Wind was released people would not have paid what we do now, it would have been ridiculously expensive.

$10 today is worth less, i.e. has less buying power, than $10 a hundred years ago, or any other time in between.

@idakooz: No, because Hollywood doesn't adjust for inflation (they only care about the money made, not how many people saw it) and things returning to theaters and the additional money is always counted.

Avatar itself had multiple releases.

But will we get Fin Fang Foom as well?

@PrpleTrtleBuBum: There's also the fact that by the time his next movie comes out he'll likely be sixty, and it would not be at all od for him to call it quits at that point.

@lostn: Has to be referring to D:OS, Divinity was more of an ARPG.

@priest: And they're not for travelling through the Astral plane, though Swen screwed that up.

@sammyg111: But the shareholders!

He fails to understand the simple fact that if someone is evil, they can't be a hero and just reminds me of all the people that pretend that monsters in their creation aren't zombies.