Game was a little unfairly shit on given how well it actually played. Then again, EA deserves any shit thrown their way given they don't give a damn about polishing their games despite having more than enough to afford it.
Well, with the amount of bugs it had a launch, it deserved a lot of it.
Unfortunately, the stink of those bugs clinged to it even after it got patched up into a solid game. It has the best combat mechanics in the series, but it need more development time to make it a truly good game. Despite what we got having been made in about a year and a half, it having been in some state of development for years prior to that resulted in EA not being willing to give it that time, which is not unreasonable.
ME3's ending wasn't half bad. People claim that all your decisions must affect the final 5 minutes of the game, but I don't see how that would be possible. Instead, I am in agreement that the entire game from start to finish represented your previous choices.
I found it baffling when people complained that it didn't show the results of all of your choices from the previous games. All I could think is 'did you play the game and pay attention?' The entire game is paying off all of those decisions and showing the repercussions. Just because it didn't have one of those cheesy hollywood summaries at the end doesn't mean it didn't pay any of those choices off.
They called back to damn near every choice you made in the previous two games, big and small.
"This, in turn, makes it feel even stranger that Quantumania makes no references at all to the events of Loki Season 1, where the man who would become Kang the Conqueror was introduced."
You have that backwards, it introduced the man Kang will become.
Welverin's comments