COD5, Soul Calibur 4 and Dead space look better on the PS3. Fallout 3 and The Force Unleashed look better on the 360. But overall differences are very minor.

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

Point is, AMD just owned Intel, i have a core 2 CPU but i must admit the Phenom 9900 owns, competitive performance for 200$ less (not as good performance but the difference is no way near worth 200$) Now that is ownage.

My graphic card (Viper HD 2900 XT 1GB) runs this game fine at High settings (resolution of 1280x1024)

I still cant decide which one to get (8800gt or HD 3870), i think i will decide when the new ATI drivers are released, if they improve the HD 3870's performance i will get the HD 3870, if they dont i will go for the 8800gt.

lol back in the days i used to play Mario sunshine, sadly i will not be playing Galaxy on the Wii because Nintendo let me down with the Wii (and the Gamecube), but the Wii is more of a letdown than the Gamecube as it's controller plain sucks and its hardware is last gen and not worth its price (although its cheap), The Wii is aimed at casuals and not at real gamers, real gamers stay away from the Wii. And Mario Galaxy doesnt really look better than Mario sunshine, one of the first last gen games! The only screen in which i can tell the difference is the death screen and in some screens Sunshine actually looks better.

Even if Vista is a little slower than XP im glad i got it, the interface is beautiful, the security is excellent, the stability is good and it has much more features and options than Windows XP.