RadioactiveApeX's forum posts

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts
I don't have it... so, I guess I'm on drugs
Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

I have a Wii60 and it rocks

Most of the good, exclusive PS3 games seem to be coming to the 360 anyway, so you get the most out of your consoles this way.

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

I believe in both, but God overall. I believe it was all orchestrated. Athiests will say that this is illogical. They use logic as their god, yet what they believe is highly illogical. If you ask them is it logical for you to buy a lottery ticket with the expectation of winning, they will say it's illogical and I will agree. They believe that Earth just happened to be the perfect distance from the Sun to achieve this perfect temperature when the slightest change would mean doom for us. They believe that the Earth just happens to spin into day and night when the slightest change in axis would mean destruction  and that plant life just happened to grow and supply air. So many factors had to be exactly right for us to survive yet they think it's all by chance. The chance of this is astronomically low. The chance of random creation is far..far less logical than the lottery scenario. Before the big bang, there was already matter and energy. Where did it come from? Scientists don't know. According to them, all these factors just randomly happened even though the odds are astronomically against it. If any athiest presents their theories as facts, take them as theories because that's simply all they are. Keep believing.Trashface

 I think you might be misunderstanding a few things.  Since we believe that the Earth came first, we believe that all living things adapted so that they could survive on Earth (the single celled organisms that couldn't died off quickly and the ones that could remained to evolve); in other words, humans are perfect for the Earth, not the Earth is perfect for humans.  The Earth spins on it's axis so well because both the moon and the sun work to balance the Earth and the moon was created when the Earth was still in the early stages of forming and an asteroid hit the Earth and a chunk broke off and started revolving around it (the laws of rotation are basic laws of Physics so I won't go over them), and the Earth has actually changed the rotational patterns around it's axis slightly during the existence of man (this caused the Egyptian grasslands to change into desert).  Plant life didn't just happen to grow, it evolved over time.  Also, there was plenty of carbon dioxide in the environment at the time plant life evolved so it makes sense that organisms feeding off of that would survive in the environment and oxygen was the byproduct.  As plants covered the Earth there became a lot of oxygen as well, so now it also makes sense for organisms feeding off of oxygen to furthur survive and give off carbon dioxide as the byproduct.  Before the big bang there was no matter or energy in the universe except for in one little tiny spot.  You can think off everything before this as a big black hole and, like all black holes, there is a concentration of matter and energy at the bottom.

 I just briefly covered each of these topics and probably didn't do much of a justice, but if you're interested they're all easily researchable.

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts
:roll: ugh... thank God I'm an Atheist!
Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

Well... judging by the fact that Gamespot is really hyping up Super Paper Mario with this whole week-long impressions thing on the entire first half of the game, I'd say that they've already played their review copy and are planning to give the game a very high score.  Why else would they devote this much attention to it?

I think it's too early to tell whether or not Super Mario Galaxy will get a better score (I've only really seen one level), but I can certainly predict that Super Paper Mario's score will be tough to beat.

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

Ugh... don't remind me!

DS:

Advance Wars: Dual Strike (just started)

Diddy Kong Racing (1/4 way through)

Meteos (just started)

Star Fox Command (1/3 way through)

Wii:

Twilight Princess (3/4 way through)

Wii Sports (need to get pro score on all the sports)

360 (here's the big one):

Call of Duty 3 (almost done, two missions left)

Condemned (barely started)

Dead Rising (1/4 way through)

Oblivion (lol)

Gears of War (1/2 way through)

Lost Planet (1/3 way through)

Perfect Dark (barely started)

Saint's Row (1/2 way through)

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

I got to the Lakebed Temple in Twilight Princess today! :D

But the next couple of days are looking pretty busy so i might not get another chance to play a lot until Friday :(

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts

As for coming out in 2007 mainly just Zelda and Final Fantasy

But overall for the DS in 2007, I'd like to pick up a lot of the games I've missed over the past couple of years.

Avatar image for RadioactiveApeX
RadioactiveApeX

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 RadioactiveApeX
Member since 2006 • 80 Posts
It's Rosie O'Donnell--nobody, NOBODY else is that terrifying or intimidating... just ask Donald Trump.