If the government did 9/11, then the government has no hesitation to killing its own citizens, correct? If this is true, why hasn't the government started to kill everyone who preaches the "truth" about the events of 9/11?

All the cool kids had Silver.

Really depends on the job, if its working for the police then yes. But if your working on a cruise ship then no.bobaban

Why not? The last thing we need is for people to be doing drugs on a ship, then fall overboard and drown.

I disagree. I think the employer has a right to know if you have a criminal record, but has no right to know whether I or LJS or any other employee secretly smokes pot at weekends. He is not a law enforcement agent and shouldn't be given the powers of one.jimmyjammer69

Employers aren't given the power of law enforcement agents. They don't drug test potential employees so they can turn them in to the cops. In fact, most companies just tell the person they failed and that's that. No police are involved.

The job market is competitive. Employers want to get the best person for the job. If that person has a secret, yet illegal habit, the employer has a right to know so he can make the best decision. Its their business-- they're perfectly within their rights to make sure their employees aren't doing drugs. Who would want risk employing someone who could be a liability later on? Why should employees be forced to turn a blind eye to a factor that may cause an employee to injure himself, others, or the company name?

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"] Yes? You've nothing against random alcohol tests? A hungover employee is probably as dangerous as a guy who was stoned yesterday, and why shouldn't your boss have the right to sack you because you've been drinking yesterday?jimmyjammer69

We're talking about illegal drugs here. If somebody chooses to do something that's illegal in their spare time that can impact job performance, the employer has a right to know.

You make it seem like drug testing lets an employer gain all sorts of information about one's personal life. It's just a drug test. It detects drugs. That's it. Its just a means to protect the company (and potentially the employee, should he injure himself on the job due to his drug use).

[QUOTE="Nitrouz"]

Prince of Darkness....I think :P

Lief_Ericson

Na i dont think it is

"What does an Atheist experience before he/she dies?"

...Heart... failure?

I don't know, but I doubt it'd vary between Atheists and religious folks.

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

[QUOTE="Genetic_Code"] I could write a novel on this, but from past experience, I know that my effort would be like trying to move a mountain by faith. ghoklebutter

In my eyes Christianity is false but I think it has good teachings, like tolerance and love. I'm not sure whether it's contradictory though.

Something that has yet to be seen by those arguing for Christianity in this thread. >_>

Dr. Greenleaf was so convinced by the overwhelming evidence; he committed his life to Jesus Christ!" source: Evidence that Demands a Verdict

blackregiment

If the evidence is so overwhelming, why isn't everyone a Christian?