@weewalio @stev69 "Daddy didn't like that... NOT.. ONE.. BIT!... Why so serious?!"

@GenericUser12 @pspearman @Mr_Mark_Legion Or because they like chess? There's a new version of chess I don't know about?

@alaindc exactly, well said

what is this daylight crap? Ubisoft... the reason no one wants to buy splinter cell after double agent is because you aren't making splinter cell games anymore... ur making action games with no stealth WITH sam fisher... just aint gonna cut it

The guy who wrote this article needs to ask himself this question... "Should I bother informing everyone that Battlefield players want to see multi player instead of single player?" Well.. DURRRRR. What a dumb editor.

He thinks crysis 3 is better then crysis 1? Uh, now that's just funny. Graphics don't make the game... and that's why crysis 3 fails. Linear corridor shooting is not what crysis 1 offered, and that's where it went after crysis 1 which is sad. THIS IS WHY I WON'T BUY CRYSIS 2 OR 3... my god listen to your fan base. We want SANDBOX.

@CrazyOldCracker @LeonsKnnedy Agree with sticking with PC, best platform you can game on. I use 360 for fighting games or halo, bout it.

@PhilipO45 microsoft hasnt even shown off anything yet... patience my friend, what you don't understand is hardware is not everything. Without devs focusing on utilizing that 8 core processor, it is pointless. It's hard to get even 4 cores utilized as it is.

@kljhkll it says Jeff FROM GIANT BOMB... not from GAMESPOT. Read buddy.

@PcGamer4Ever1 @gplayer5 Exactly, crysis 2 and 3 are just scripted run down a corridor type shooters. Crysis 1 was the only ground breaking crysis game because it was wide open, and even the graphics look more realistic. Don't buy this garbage.