MxAa's comments

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

o just buy a computer, u get better games and better quality graphics for about the same price as if u include a bazilion inch tv with the ps3.... hard drives should not be a concern in a video game console. It's a game center, not a "store your porn" center.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

nice.... whats new.... the ps3 version is always the same compared to the 360, blurrier... why do they bother comparing over and over again. It's because most of these games are not developed straight up for the ps3, it's such a dumb comparison.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

overall, the 8800 GT gets framerates close to the 8800 GTX for what, 240 BUCKS.... Why do people think ATI is still the way to go. The core clock is at 825 mhz.... thats a lot and yet the performance is still worse then a 8800 GTX which is at 580 to 600 mhz. Honestly, all that heat goes to waste. ATI needs remake the gpu all together, at that clock speed these cards should be doing a lot better.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

e011234 I hope you know the PS3 is the worst console out there right now. The hardware is so bottleknecked on itself rofl. You get no more then 30 fps on every game on the ps3 so I don't really understand your logic. The game will be patched and drivers will fix framerates eventually, its just a known fact that it takes time to get things working right.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

u ppl keep asking if u can run it, LOOK AT THE DAMN CHARTS YOU IDIOTS... THAT's WHAT IT'S FOR.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

I have two 7950 GT's, amd x2 4600, 2gb ddr2 corsair ram, and runs this game maxed at 1680 x 1050 with pretty much fps in the 60's and even 80's.Gears of war is the same.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

considering i have dual 7950 GT's (even one is more powerful then a 8500 GT) and I get 17 to 27 fps on all high at 1680 x1050 except for shaders on medium, i think you will be at the same framerate for all medium at low resolution with low shaders NnethKe.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

i cant even get the game to run on my sli 7950 setup.... something is wrong because I hear birds chirping 3/4 through loading and then it just runs at 2 fps (yes 2 fps) when its done loading. Any ideas would be helpful....

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

x2900xt seems like the best bang for your buck but, still seems like nvidia's got much better drivers. 2900xtx will most def beat the gtx. Too bad ive got an SLI mobo =/. Guess I'm stuck with buying 2 nvidia cards.

Avatar image for MxAa
MxAa

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MxAa

rofl, dx 10 is more realistic, thats not to say it looks better. The only thing its gonna improve in games like say... crysis... is motion blurr and particle effects. This means it has to be 2 videos compared to see the difference.