That's why I used it. the core gameplay is the same but it's just better, I don't know what it is but play 2 then play 3. Graphics aside the gameplay is much better in 3 compared to 2.I like how you used GOW to make a point, 'cause aside from the added visual flare, the gameplay is exactly the same.
-Snooze-
LiquidSnake1001's forum posts
If you ever insult Wii's hardware on these boards the sheep instantly call you a graphics whore, but in my opinion better hardware leans to better gameplay.
Stuff like set pieces, A.I, enemy size, cover systems, sense of scale etc.
I'm not going to bore you with a wall of text but anyone's whose played GOW3, go back and play GOW2 and see the difference in quality an upgrade of hardware makes.
What do you guys think?.
Why the hell would you like that cheap knock off more then the real thing, I'm glad Dante's Inferno failed for it's lack of originality. Anyway I just got Metro and it's pretty poor to be honest, I'd give it a 6 so far so IGN were generous imo.[QUOTE="LiquidSnake1001"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
No, I knew I'd like it more. I knew GoW3 would score higher.
BioShockOwnz
Cause I don't like Kratos or Greek mythology.
Dante's Inferno had subject matter that actually mattered to me.
That's fair enough I guess but I still think GOW3 is miles ahead, and it's not like these games are that heavy story wise.[QUOTE="MethodManFTW"]BSO; You predicted Dante's Inferno would be better than GoWIII, so should we never believe anything you say again? BioShockOwnz
No, I knew I'd like it more. I knew GoW3 would score higher.
Why the hell would you like that cheap knock off more then the real thing, I'm glad Dante's Inferno failed for it's lack of originality. Anyway I just got Metro and it's pretty poor to be honest, I'd give it a 6 so far so IGN were generous imo.
Log in to comment