@LJS9502_basic: Science has proven plenty of it. Religions were born around natural occurring events like the weather, stars, etc. And just because we don't know something yet, doesn't mean we have to fill the knowledge gap with "faith" or religion.
You're conflating advancements and that is all you're doing. Science doesn't address what you think it does, nor should it.
@mrbojangles25: I agree with the view mentioned by jag85 that its a topic that should be separated in to individual issues.
But I don't like when people mention topics like "Wanting women to have equal rights, access to home loans, the right to vote," it feels like a strawman argument and it makes it hard to try to bring up other individual topics that I find unfair about current feminism, since it paints opinions different than feminism as extremist.
This also relates to my previous comment as using an historical view to justify current policy, even if the current situation is completely different from the past.
So you want to cherry pick rather than address the reasons for why it exists. If you only deal with your own biases, you learn nothing.
There are conflicting claims over who is responsible for the Moscow attack:
Ukrainians
ISIS
America or Israel
Russian inside job
The jury is still out on this one.
ISIS have claimed responsibility.
They've been trying to spin this hard.
To be honest, if true this is surprising, I was expecting Putin to have done this.
He's orchestrated murders and terrorist attacks multiple times. Including here on UK soil with with chemical and radiative weapons. Let alone blowing up Wagner heads last year.
Social media said ISIS claimed responsibility, it also said they didn't. Link?
I am not religious myself (I am an atheist), but I am glad you found something that works for you :) People who judge others for their religious beliefs are lame. Stay strong!
People who judge others for arbitrary reasons are pathetic.
Log in to comment