I don't understand why people are happy about this, now you have to pay taxes on each purchase so your going to be paying more, have odd numbers of cents left over, and probably never get $20 for $15 like they did with points.
@leandrro @ChiefFreeman " xbox one gpu can only run 64players in 60fps and 1080p on bf3 equivalent lower settings"......When it's in a computer. People need to realize comparing a PC part to a console part doesn't work. Consoles get better optimization and need far less to do what a PC does.
As long as it has a different setting (not a tropical setting again), a different cast of characters, and is more polished I'll at least rent it. Don't have high hopes though because Riptide was somehow buggier than the original.
@Daian @akdiuuuryttt @JayQproductions Yes, I know there are tons of games that don't let you aim down the sights of a weapon but in this day and age it is not acceptable, there is no reason to not be able to do it. It's also VERY unrealistic and most of the games that don't let you aim down sites where made 10+ years ago when aiming down your sights was almost impossible to do in games and take FAR less skill than those that allow it. The only people that prefer when games don't let you aim down the sights either have terrible aim or are lazy and want the easy way to play a game.
@VenkmanPHD @Daian I kinda agree, L4D has always seemed like a quick cash in. You feel like your floating instead of walking and I absolutely HATE FPS games where you can't aim down the sights of your gun and the only reason I can think of to not be able to aim down sights is they didn't wanna spend the extra time coding and animating it.
@TheAgingGamer The L4D games are more than likely cheaper and quicker to make and have probably outsold everything HL combined so I can see why they would do L4D3 first.
JayQproductions' comments