Just when I think SW couldn't get more dumb... :|FunconsoleWhat does SW stand for?
IcyFlamez96's forum posts
[QUOTE="IcyFlamez96"][QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"] How does this have anything to do with what I said? Im just saying It would be interesting If they made their own gameGreenGoblin2099
Well, because you obviously disagree with some of their scores... and sinceyou seem to know better, why don YOU mak a game and show us?? ;)
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]you don't have to be able to do something to judge it. you don't need to be an oscar-winning director to say "this movie is bad" or "this movie is good", and you don't have to be shigeru miyamoto to criticize a game. you sound like someone who is butthurt over some random review, one that, who knows, may not even be written yet, as if you were damage controlling something. "OH THEY THINK THEY KNOW WHAT MAKES A GOOD GAME AND WHAT DOESN'T I WANNA SEE THEM TRY AND MAKE SOMETHING NEARLY AS GOOD AS *insert game*!" Excuse me!? I dont care much about reviews, they are just interesting to read and I agree with most of them anyway. But thats not even the point!!! Jeez how do you guys get all of this from me saying that they should make their own game!? You guys are ridiculous......FFXIII had the best battle systems of all FFs
I like sonic games better than mario games, (the old ones at least) and Sonic Colors to me looks alot more fun than the mario games ive played, not bashing Mario though.
Zelda is kinda fun and all but I dont see why Its soo famous. It doesnt seem like it does anything special. But again not bashing Zelda. I like what I played.
RATCHET AND CLANK IS ONE OF THE BEST GAME FRANCHISES.
How does this have anything to do with what I said? Im just saying It would be interesting If they made their own gameThey don't know better than you or me... that's just their opinion, and I'm pretty sure someone else will agree or even think the game deserves a lower score.
Just stick toyour own judgement and if you think the game's a 10/10, why would you care if others don't think so??
GreenGoblin2099
[QUOTE="IcyFlamez96"]
They should just make their own game and see if their game is amazing. I'd think it would be interesting. Im not sure If they know anything about the actuall creation of games though, but they could hire some people and run all if the game makin bussiness.
BTW: dont take my topic title that seriously
P.S. I know their are other game rating places but I just wanna stick with these two..... Mostly IGN
Do you think they could make an amazing game if they had the people to do it. I mean, before they release it they could just like "review" thier own game and figure out what could make it better until its perfect in their eyes.
Bretter2200
IGN isn't a single person, games are judged by varying reviewers.
DuhhhhThey should just make their own game and see if their game is amazing. I'd think it would be interesting. Im not sure If they know anything about the actuall creation of games though, but they could hire some people and run all if the game makin bussiness.
P.S. I know their are other game rating places but I just wanna stick with these two..... Mostly IGN
Do you think they could make an amazing game if they had the people to do it. I mean, before they release it they could just like "review" thier own game and figure out what could make it better until its perfect in their eyes.
EDIT: I dont know why everyone is assuming that they gave a game I liked a low score or something. Im not mad at all so I dont know why people think I am. Im just curious at how It would be if they made their own game. And Im aware that they dont have the skills to make their own game, but If they hired some people who knew how and people from IGN and GAMESPOT just told them what to do and whatnot, do you think they could make it good?
I just started getting interested in RAGE about a week ago and although RAGE looks really good the only thing stopping me from getting it this month is the short story mode, but thats not the point of this post.
I actually meant to post this before the IGN review came out but I knew the game would be good but I didnt think it would be really phenominal. And im not just going by what IGN said, I was expecting it to get an 8.5 from it anyway. But the point is, the game devs will start reading the critism on this game (whatever that may be) and maybe start working on a RAGE 2 while adressing most of the complaints from the first one. I'd think it'd be pretty rare for a game company to make a PHENOMINAL new IP on there first try. But im not sure if anyone has but RAGE would be the perfect game for me if it had tons of weapons, a strong story, and a long campaign which is what they would have the opportunity to do If they made a RAGE 2.
But im sure I will LOVE RAGE anyway :p
What do you guys think?
[QUOTE="IcyFlamez96"]
But games like mario and Zelda have WAYYYYY more fans and thhose games seem to be aimed more towards kids. Nintendo is just an overall better console for more children-oriented and platformer games period.
I dont know it just kind of saddens me that my favorite game series doesnt really get the fame it deserves...
I probably missed some stuff that I was going to say but ya know....
EDIT: Sorry about font color before I had no idea it was gray
Lucianu
Aimed at kids, my ass, they are aimed at all ages. But that's beside the point, you should know why Mario & Zelda has more fans, and that's because they are far more older franchises, and they started on the, now, legendary NES. Not only that, but some of the key games in the franchises did something revolutionary.
And that's about it. I feel you wen you're saying that your favorite game deserve more popularity, but i get that vibe wen i see a very obscure game that i love, not wen i'm playing a already popular series.
I wasnt trying to offend anyone with this statement but I think thier aimed more towards kids then any onther ages. Of course most of the fans might be the long time fans of the series.
Log in to comment