@spacecadet25 @GameFan1983 @KinoDaKonqueror read again, I never said CE is better than UDK. You should learn some basics about coding and what middleware and these engine does before challenging someone who's far experienced on the field, I said in term of coding convenience CE such as debug, middle-ware converter, flow-graphic etc, CE edges out UDK4.0 10 out of 10 times and still is one of the best in the business,then again majority developers playing on either engine aren't even programers(90% or more)
@KinoDaKonqueror as if you know a thing about coding, Cryengine has always been coder friendly and still is the best platform for any C++/C# middleware plug in compare to any competitor engines. The default graphic assets completely blow UDK4 out of water in every respect and far less resource consuming too, ask any developer or coder and see if they will tell you other wise. The workflow is kind messy compare to UE4 and other because is kind old. other than that, Cryengine is still the developer's no.1 pick.
Learn to UDK or cryengine before pretending you know what you're talking about
@zerofrust I find it hilarious when some PC virgins actually believe their version is capable of E3 2012's graphic on GTX680 SlI when 2 GTX780Ti SLI failed to max out the downgraded version @ 1080P 60fps.
here's a catch though, infamous SS is the only game look identical and better than WD 2012 demo.
@marcjobs @GameFan1983 you should clam down, all version looked worse in streamed videos, so regardless which version you own, they all gonna look better than what video suggested.
@marcjobs ;facepalm, not really, what made you think PS4 look worse than that? (I owning PC version only on a blooding edge PC, my step brother owning PS4 version)
@billlabowski I don't know how owning a $1000 rig and inferior version is being ahead. so far 99% PC virgins absolutely failed to get the game running.
GameFan1983's comments