GameFan1983's comments

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@spacecadet25 @GameFan1983 @KinoDaKonqueror read again, I never said CE is better than UDK. You should learn some basics about coding and what middleware and these engine does before challenging someone who's far experienced on the field, I said in term of coding convenience CE such as debug, middle-ware converter, flow-graphic etc, CE edges out UDK4.0 10 out of 10 times and still is one of the best in the business,then again majority developers playing on either engine aren't even programers(90% or more)

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By GameFan1983

@KinoDaKonqueror as if you know a thing about coding, Cryengine has always been coder friendly and still is the best platform for any C++/C# middleware plug in compare to any competitor engines. The default graphic assets completely blow UDK4 out of water in every respect and far less resource consuming too, ask any developer or coder and see if they will tell you other wise. The workflow is kind messy compare to UE4 and other because is kind old. other than that, Cryengine is still the developer's no.1 pick.


Learn to UDK or cryengine before pretending you know what you're talking about

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@zerofrust I find it hilarious when some PC virgins actually believe their version is capable of E3 2012's graphic on GTX680 SlI when 2 GTX780Ti SLI failed to max out the downgraded version @ 1080P 60fps.


here's a catch though, infamous SS is the only game look identical and better than WD 2012 demo.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@diggyphelps @GameFan1983 @wa128 @natalieyan you should try harder, PC version bite the dust.


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-watch-dogs-tech-analysis

"the PS4 edition remains a very handsome-looking game compared to the PC release running at maximum settings."


I own PC version only btw.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wa128 they did showcase outdoor, at least watch the video first, and it's considerably worse on PC.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wa128 you are trying too hard, 0:58 is the 8 year old PS3 version you are comparing to.

offical

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-watch-dogs-performance-analysis


"the PS4 edition remains a very handsome-looking game compared to the PC release running at maximum settings."

which 99.99% PC gamers can't get access to.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wa128 @jablocanas you are trying too hard, 0:58 is the ps3 version.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@marcjobs @GameFan1983 you should clam down, all version looked worse in streamed videos, so regardless which version you own, they all gonna look better than what video suggested.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@marcjobs ;facepalm, not really, what made you think PS4 look worse than that? (I owning PC version only on a blooding edge PC, my step brother owning PS4 version)



Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@billlabowski I don't know how owning a $1000 rig and inferior version is being ahead. so far 99% PC virgins absolutely failed to get the game running.