Not necessarily...
EboyLOL's forum posts
The issue is not penis size (necessarily) in relation to gun ownership. It's insecurity in relation to gun ownership.Well I can't find one credible source that notes a correlation between Gun ownership and penis size. Its an urban legend. People are drawn to these things for different reasons. I LOVE the science and mechanics behind firearms, I could talk about ballistics 'till I am blue in the face. Some people like the history, some people like the politics behind them.
Frattracide
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Frattracide"]People clearly associate guns with penises. That we're even having this discussion proves it. And it was Freud who really first proposed these various ideas about sexuality, which then helped to inspire femininism.The whole idea that men who like guns/fast cars/boats/whatever are trying to compensate is largely a myth. The same thing goes with men equating sex and violence. Both ideas are a bad side effect of the feminist movement.
Frattracide
Freud was largely discredited on a lot of his theories. The only reason people associate these thing is because they were told too.
I'll use myself as an example. I have no "issues" about the size of my "member" but still like firearms. Shooting a weapon doesn't make me feel "More like a man."
Some of Freud's ideas are in question to day on the basis that there is no real way to prove or disprove them. That said, I totally agree with the idea of many men feeling insecure about their masculinity and buying guns to compensate for it.Can someone please enlighten me. Is it because they don't hold a strong enough majority, or is it because they just choose not to do anything for whatever reason? Please someone tell me!Shenmue_JehutyBoth. Not to mention that the democrats are rather unorganized at the moment.
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]the only std i'm scared of is pregnancy.
Dracargen
That's not funny. That's not funny at all.
I beg to differ. Babies suck big time :lol:In relation to some other thread, dying for your country is BAD! If you die in war then your only giving the enemy what they want, I think it's more righteous to KILL for your country, Dying is merely giving up, anyone see the difference?Nasty_butler_9Alright. Hey you US marines! You can't get killed anymore in Iraq, or else you are a traitor to this country, and a lazyass who gave up!
/sarcasm
I don't see what you mean whatsoever.
[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="knowledge-funk"]Research Al Qaeda if you wish; they're history, creation, etc.
knowledge-funk
Okay, let's go to Wikipedia.
Al-Qaeda ... is an international alliance of militant Islamic terrorist organizations founded in 1988 by Abdullah Yusuf Azzam (later replaced by Osama Bin Laden) and other veteran "Afghan Arabs" after the Soviet War in Afghanistan.
Wikipedia
Am I missing the part where it says "...and they are completely fictional and don't actually exist"?
Firstly, wikipedia? common. I'll use my links if you choose to use what you wish.
Second, I didn't mention that their history will explain would out-right explain them being iction.
http://www.oilempire.us/qaeda.html
http://www.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/afghans.html
http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/041207Laden.htm
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/printerfriendly.php?storyid=2936
Kid, if I look hard enough, I could find websites equally as credible as the ones you're providing that say 9-11 was the result of Martians. The internetz aren't real...I read every single Redwall book.
Log in to comment