[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

Really? Then why did Gears of War for PC score a 9.0 here on Gamespot and it even has the best tag next to it? The 360 version scored a 9.5 for an inferior game. Why is that?

rexoverbey

And you know that how? You're just speculating now.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="bignice12"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"]

WIC is holding a 89% at gamerankings it's far from the perfect game Ocampo made it out to be.

rexoverbey

lol so if a game is rated under what GS rated it on GR(flawed system imo), it means it is overrated? Why do you worship gamerankings so much? Actually play the game before you claim it to be overrated.

Sorry, the poll says Crysis is still winning. Your opinion is worth the same as everyone else's here, and I think the poll says it all.

Well then it's your opinion to take professional reviews over average people's reviews. :P So, have you ever even played Crysis?

[QUOTE="horrowhip"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="bignice12"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"]

WIC is holding a 89% at gamerankings it's far from the perfect game Ocampo made it out to be.

tacosareyummy

lol so if a game is rated under what GS rated it on GR(flawed system imo), it means it is overrated? Why do you worship gamerankings so much? Actually play the game before you claim it to be overrated.

GR is flawed because there are a ton of different review systems and reviewing standards. Half the PCsites go by the 5.0 scale where a 5.0 game is GS equivilant of a 7.5(average). Thats how it is flawed. And then, there are the console sites that give out 10's like candy.

IT IS a FLAWED system.

And I GUARRANTEE you haven't played neither Crysis nor WiC more than I have... GUARRANTEED.

Really? Then why did Gears of War for PC score a 9.0 here on Gamespot and it even has the best tag next to it? The 360 version scored a 9.5 for an inferior game. Why is that?

[QUOTE="bignice12"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"]

WIC is holding a 89% at gamerankings it's far from the perfect game Ocampo made it out to be.

rexoverbey

lol so if a game is rated under what GS rated it on GR(flawed system imo), it means it is overrated? Why do you worship gamerankings so much? Actually play the game before you claim it to be overrated.

Sorry, the poll says Crysis is still winning. Your opinion is worth the same as everyone else's here, and I think the poll says it all.

Both have about 8 hour campaigns and multiplayer is vastly superior in CoD4. CoD4 is definitely the better game IMO by a longshot.

Puckhog04

Crysis has a 12 hour campaign at least and CoD4 has a 6 hour campaign. Where did you even get the number 8?

Dragon Age, Hellgate: London, The Witcher, A Crysis spinoff, Far Cry 2(Oh HELLZ yeah), Tabula Rasa(Even though NCSoft sucks), WoW with special keyboard adapters for a good control scheme, STALKER, STALKER: Clear Sky, Project Origin.

So yeah.

-TheSecondSign-

Lol with the amount of games that you want, it would be worth it to just build a gaming PC when you have the monies. ;)

It's worth it, trust me.

[QUOTE="Axel_rocks14"]I remember a hilarious post where PS3_FTW was talking about how his dad works at sony and when we asked him to prove that he even has a PS3, he showed us a PS3 pic with the gamespy watermark on it. laughingman42

Thats not how it happened. first the background. The day before he said something to the exent of "I'm going to bed its midnight" It was midnight in Englands timezone. the next day someone said he didnt have a PS3 and they told him to post a picture proving that he did. He posted the picture of a PS3 with a gamespy watermark. then everyone called him out on it so then he said "Its mine I work at Gamespy". then someone called him out on the fact that gamespy is based in the US and that he lives in England (well somewhere in Europe, but he used slang common to England)

LOL that's hilarious.

[QUOTE="Haee"][QUOTE="naval"]alan wake and gta for that matter are not that memory intensive. they have medium sized world (small compared to far cry 2) with empty objects like pedestranians in between

naval

Please link exactlyhow you know that Far Cry 2's world is larger then GTA4's and Alan Wake's (Especially Alan Wake's because I havent heard from that game in a long while.)

i am just guessing the average sizes for such games and comparing it to 51 sq miles. well you have link where it says otherwise.

Ok I just looked at the screen shots for GTA IV and the graphics are nowhere near Far Cry 2. And the draw distance is terrible, all of the buildings in the background have almost no detail on them unless you're near them, and even then it's not that great.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]GTA is different because it has no physics, AI is almost non-existant, the graphics are pretty terrible compared to Far Cry 2. You think GTA is on the same technical level Far Cry 2 is?

Haee

Im not certain, GTA4 isnt released yet and your making the assumption that GTA4 will not improve on it's flaws. Otherwise if your directly comparing Farcry 2 with an GTAfrom last gen then this is far from an fair arguement.

I havent seen much of Far Cry 2 but regardless im just saying that im fairly skeptical on it's exclusivity..BTW I think GTA4's graphics are awesome.

I'm willing to bet that GTA IV will not have improved on the physics and AI aspect of the game. Sure the graphics are better, but the draw distances are really nothing to brag about. You are hyping the game for graphics and technical aspects when the GTA games do not need those attributes to be good games. I loved the other GTA games, but graphics don't make those games. And Far Cry 2 draw distances, larger textures, much larger worlds, and physics and AI are surely something that consoles cannot do right now. Every enemy lives a life and have a schedule basically. Consoles just don't have the RAM to store all of that info.