@Pilgrim117 @de-astroturfer That is absolutely irrelevant. Just learn a bit of history from the video game world and you'll be surprised how EVERYTIME in the past the "weakest" console was the most successful.
@supermarioooooo @Assemblent It's getting worse and worse (being the last of us the latest expression of biased review). They always had such inclination, but now it's just blatant and in-your-face "fansiteism"...
@deathstream @xxYetterxx @snake3rules Deathstream, you're sounding a lot like those payed guys on Reddit,. That or you're a blind fanboy trying to justify your allegiance with half truths and not talking about mandatory installs, online every 24 hours and your games don't work, kinetic BIG BROTHER 1984, cannot share your games with friends or sell them, the total disrespect for gamers with their policies (microsoft).
And now suddenly having to pay for playing online with the PS is such a bad thing where you've done that forever in the Xbox since forever? Without any free games? You can't play online without paying, at least you can still play single player. Don't be a hypocrite and a devil's advocate that's sounding like a microsoft fetching dog or a blind fanboy (without disrespect).
@visionedorange Brace yourself fellow gamer. Deathstream will come here in denial trying to convince the most gullible ones that Xbox One is the same as PS4.
@Hellknite190 @Assemblent First of all, yes, you are right. No review is wrong, as incoherent or as biased it might be. It's a personal opinion. On that we agree. Still, I think that reviews, specially on major websites, should be more PROFESSIONAl than PERSONAL, not just being incoherent because is personal tastes for video games. (For example: I don't like GTA at all, still, I recognize that it is an GREAT and OUTSTANDING GAME, or, if you want to go musically, I don't like Opera at all or the way they sing, still, I know that Opera great singers are out of this world and the composition of the music requires touches of genious).
Well, if 95% of the reviews are that high, looking at previous "strange reviews" that were given by him, looking back at the games he normally reviews and reading is short gamespot bio maybe, just maybe, he wasn't the right person to do it? And if other major reviewers (and with major, I mean the best) from other major websites were unanimous, maybe something is wrong here. And I want to be clear that I'm not bitching or complaining about the score, I'm speaking about all the aforementioned incoherences in the review and the "casted" reviewer.
And no, I haven't played the game. Still, I have seen this story before with other strange reviews. Specially with this same author. That's why I'm "suspicious" with the review, specially of how incoherent it sounds, even without playing the game. Maybe they should have given the review to somebody else who would actually enjoy the type of game, either he ended up on liking it or not, not just putting in a fine line between average and great.
Assemblent's comments